2018
DOI: 10.1139/cjas-2017-0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of slaughter weight and growth rate on the longissimus muscle metabolic characteristics, and pork sensory quality in pigs of two sexes

Abstract: A total of 119 pigs were used to investigate the effect of slaughter weight (107, 115, and 125 kg), growth rate (fast vs. slow), and sex (barrows vs. gilts) on the longissimus muscle biochemical and sensory traits. Increasing slaughter weight to 125 kg resulted in greater postmortem activity of calpastatin (P = 0.01), lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.01), and citrate synthase (P = 0.02). Pork toughness and juiciness at 6 d were affected by the interaction slaughter weight × growth rate × sex, with pork being tough… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, Wagner (2007) in his research stated that slower-growing pigs were characterized by the lowest values of shear force. In the study of Oksbjerg et al (2000) and Duan et al (2018) the growth rate did not affect the shear force of pork. The color of the meat in the L* parameter expressing the meat lightness showed no statistically significant differences between the growth groups within individual sexes or in the whole group of pigs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…On the contrary, Wagner (2007) in his research stated that slower-growing pigs were characterized by the lowest values of shear force. In the study of Oksbjerg et al (2000) and Duan et al (2018) the growth rate did not affect the shear force of pork. The color of the meat in the L* parameter expressing the meat lightness showed no statistically significant differences between the growth groups within individual sexes or in the whole group of pigs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%