2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of slope aspect, grazing, and sampling position on the soil penetration resistance curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…PR significantly influenced soil infiltration properties and the development of root systems, and thus was closely related to soil erodibility (Parker et al, 1995;Silva et al, 2011;Bayat et al, 2017). In this study, PR was positively correlated with BD, and negatively related to BSC thickness and LD (Table V ).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Soil Erodibilitymentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PR significantly influenced soil infiltration properties and the development of root systems, and thus was closely related to soil erodibility (Parker et al, 1995;Silva et al, 2011;Bayat et al, 2017). In this study, PR was positively correlated with BD, and negatively related to BSC thickness and LD (Table V ).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Soil Erodibilitymentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Small BD was caused by slight soil consolidation, and thus soil with small BD was easier to penetrate (Parker et al, 1995;Silva, 2011;Trabaquini et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2018a). The decreases in PR with BSC thickness and LD can probably be attributed to the increase in soil porosity caused by vegetation growth (Bayat et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2018a). Wang et al (2018a) investigated the variation in soil erodibility (reflected by PR) with vegetation restoration age in the same watershed on the Loess Plateau, and found that PR was directly related to BD, BSC thickness, and LD.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Soil Erodibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). However, the crotalaria crop when used in succession with maize provided higher MRP values in relation to the other treatments at depths 150-200 and 200-250 mm (Table 2), probably due to the lower contributions of the plant residues left by the plants used as cover [22], and higher tillage of the soil that led to the destruction of the larger aggregates in smaller aggregates and to the soil particle size distribution [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To determine the mathematical model of soil cone index as a dependent variable in relation to the percentage of soil moisture content, data from soil bulk density, electrical conductivity and sampling depth were used as independent variables (Bayat et al, 2017 index prediction using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm with a middle layer (middle layers) and a different number of neurons in the middle layer (layers). The sigmoid tangent function was used between the input and middle layers and a linear type was used between the middle layers and the output layer.…”
Section: Presenting a Regression Model For Soil Cone Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has demonstrated a correlation between evaluations of the soil cone index and soil bulk density as parameters related to soil compaction and compression (Bayat et al, 2017;Henderson et al, 1988) and between the soil cone index and moisture content (Faure and Da Mata, 1994). Abbaspour-Gilandeh et al (2006) reported that soil electrical conductivity (EC) data were highly correlated to soil texture (% clay content) with a correlation coefficient of 0.916 and that there was a strong linear correlation between soil EC and draft force across a field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%