2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01256-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Small-Sided Soccer Games on Physical Fitness, Physiological Responses, and Health Indices in Untrained Individuals and Clinical Populations: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background: Small-sided soccer games (SSSG) are a specific exercise regime with two small teams playing against each other on a relatively small pitch. There is evidence from original research that SSSG exposure provides performance and health benefits for untrained adults. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize recent evidence on the acute and long-term effects of SSSG on physical fitness, physiological responses, and health indices in healthy untrained individuals and clinical populat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although two studies can be used in meta-analyses (Valentine et al, 2010), considering reduced sample sizes are common in the sports science literature (Abt et al, 2020), including in SSG studies (Zouhal et al, 2020), analysis and interpretation of results in this systematic review and meta-analysis were only conducted in the case of at least three study groups provided baseline and mental fatigue-related data for the same measure. Means and standard deviation (SD) for dependent variables were used to calculate effect sizes (ES; Hedge's g) for each outcome in the mental-fatigue and control conditions.…”
Section: Summary Measures Synthesis Of Results and Publication Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although two studies can be used in meta-analyses (Valentine et al, 2010), considering reduced sample sizes are common in the sports science literature (Abt et al, 2020), including in SSG studies (Zouhal et al, 2020), analysis and interpretation of results in this systematic review and meta-analysis were only conducted in the case of at least three study groups provided baseline and mental fatigue-related data for the same measure. Means and standard deviation (SD) for dependent variables were used to calculate effect sizes (ES; Hedge's g) for each outcome in the mental-fatigue and control conditions.…”
Section: Summary Measures Synthesis Of Results and Publication Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although two studies can be used in meta-analyses [ 34 ], considering reduced sample sizes are common in the sports science literature [ 35 ], including in SSG studies [ 30 ], analysis and interpretation of results in this systematic review and meta-analysis were only conducted in the case of at least three studies provided baseline and follow-up data for the same measure. Pre-training and post-training means and standard deviations (SD) for dependent variables were used to calculate effect sizes (ES; Hedge’s g ) for each outcome measure in the SSG-based training and control groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of recreational soccer as an approach for non-pharmacological clinical programs for specific adult populations has been widely researched [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. However, the use of SSGs, in particular, was only recently summarized in a systematic review that was not dedicated to a specific outcome, and no meta-analysis was conducted [ 30 ]. Therefore, there remains a need for a meta-analytical comparison that provides information about the effectiveness of recreational soccer SSGs vs. control groups on BMD in adult populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some systematic reviews have been done on the effects of recreational soccer in healthy and clinical populations [21,22], only one has summarized such findings related to SSGs [23]. This review [23] summarizes the findings related to different outcomes and populations (healthy and clinical) but does not include a meta-analysis. Additionally, as far as we know, specific reviews of recreational football conducted on clinical populations were specific to diabetes [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%