2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.140618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of SMAT at cryogenic and room temperatures on the kink band and martensite formations with associated fatigue resistance in a β-metastable titanium alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that, similar to surface failure, a small number of secondary cracks can be observed on the fracture surface of interior failure except for room temperature conditions. Although the secondary cracks have little effect on the fatigue failure mechanism, 50 their appearance makes the primary crack surface more complex. During the growth of the primary crack, the secondary crack is formed as a result of the stress concentration at the crack tip 37 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that, similar to surface failure, a small number of secondary cracks can be observed on the fracture surface of interior failure except for room temperature conditions. Although the secondary cracks have little effect on the fatigue failure mechanism, 50 their appearance makes the primary crack surface more complex. During the growth of the primary crack, the secondary crack is formed as a result of the stress concentration at the crack tip 37 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maurel et al. [ 307 ] associated fatigue performance of a β ‐metastable titanium alloy with the surface kink band and martensite produced by the SMAT technology at room and cryogenic temperatures (CT). Figure 25g shows the IPF mapping extracted from the EBSD testing.…”
Section: Fatigue Enhancement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Among them, austenitic stainless steels have been widely studied. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, conflicting results concerning the efficiency of these surface treatments to improve the fatigue life were observed and reported when specific treatment conditions were employed, [18][19][20][21] thus showing that the treatment parameters are sometimes critical and need to be wisely chosen in order to provide the desired enhancement in fatigue properties. Due to the importance of fatigue crack initiation in the fatigue life, such reduction of the fatigue limit is often attributed to the surface roughness and characteristic surface damage induced by the treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%