2018
DOI: 10.1080/0144929x.2018.1549595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of social-interactive engagement on the dropout ratio in online learning: insights from MOOC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 An educational and training dynamic based on social-interactive connections among learners is considered optimal for sustaining participant interest in the learning process, and building social-interactive engagement into Web-based education has been shown to help reduce the dropout rate among Web-based learners. 24 Our research revealed that PCCT members prefer in-person palliative care education and training because of its flexibility in addressing trainees' unique needs and specific issues. Compared to Web-based modules, the workshop curriculum was considered to have the potential for greater applicability and relevance for providers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…7 An educational and training dynamic based on social-interactive connections among learners is considered optimal for sustaining participant interest in the learning process, and building social-interactive engagement into Web-based education has been shown to help reduce the dropout rate among Web-based learners. 24 Our research revealed that PCCT members prefer in-person palliative care education and training because of its flexibility in addressing trainees' unique needs and specific issues. Compared to Web-based modules, the workshop curriculum was considered to have the potential for greater applicability and relevance for providers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The Both the MOOCs and the NOOCs offered spaces for social interaction (forums), in which participants could raise questions, learn among peers, and propose training alternatives to the topic addressed. The creation of these spaces aimed to promote cooperative learning, understood in this training context as an important element in the technological-interactive construction of knowledge and in interactive social participation through group work [34], [15]. Recently defined predictive factors were considered in the design of the MOOCs and NOOCs, such as the courses' quality, accessibility, and usefulness [35], [36], as well as meeting current educational training requirements for the creation of digital material [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the outcomes of their implementation has shown both their educational potential and their limitations. Among these limitations are the investment of resources and time; the need for greater institutional support [14]; the need for greater social-interactive engagement among participants [15]; high dropout rates [16], [12]; and the aggravation of issues around accessibility and exclusivity in developing countries [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of empirical studies in an OLE context is surprising given that the positive effect of collaborative interaction on school drop-out rates has been well established previously (Dennison, 2000). In general, social-interactive engagement has a significant impact on the motivation of participants and their retention rate in MOOCs (Wang, Guo, He, & Wu, 2019).…”
Section: Modeling Behavioral Consequences Of Collaborative Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%