2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of soil disturbance on plant diversity of calcareous grasslands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study revealed strong effects by physical soil disturbance on AMF community composition and diversity and by nitrogen fertilisation within the soil disturbance treatment. Soil disturbance has previously been identified as a factor influencing AMF communities' composition in natural plant communities (Husband et al 2002;Sýkorová et al 2007b;Schnoor and Olsson 2010), as well as in agroecosystems in long-term experiments (Jansa et al 2002;Rosendahl 2008;Borriello et al 2012;Stockinger et al 2014). The negative effect of physical soil disturbance on plant root colonisation found here has been previously reported in heathland and forest, but not in an annual pasture (Jasper et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study revealed strong effects by physical soil disturbance on AMF community composition and diversity and by nitrogen fertilisation within the soil disturbance treatment. Soil disturbance has previously been identified as a factor influencing AMF communities' composition in natural plant communities (Husband et al 2002;Sýkorová et al 2007b;Schnoor and Olsson 2010), as well as in agroecosystems in long-term experiments (Jansa et al 2002;Rosendahl 2008;Borriello et al 2012;Stockinger et al 2014). The negative effect of physical soil disturbance on plant root colonisation found here has been previously reported in heathland and forest, but not in an annual pasture (Jasper et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Soil disturbance also affects abiotic properties of the soil like nutrient availability (Fraterrigo et al 2005) or soil moisture (Robertson et al 1993). Soil disturbance is also known to decrease plant species competition in grasslands (Wilson and Tilman 1993), creating new patches for plant colonisation (Grubb 1977) and for competition for light (De Cauwer et al 2006), resulting in an increase in plant biodiversity (Schnoor and Olsson 2010). Specific interactions have been reported between pairs of plant and fungal symbionts (Vandenkoornhuyse et al 2003;Scheublin et al 2007), and a decisive influence of AMF on plant communities was demonstrated (van der Heijden et al 1998(van der Heijden et al , 2003(van der Heijden et al , 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…S; it stands for all the species in a plot; S is the number of species; N is the sum of the numbers of all species in a plot; ni is the number of ith species in a plot; c is the number of species that appear in both a plot and control area; a and b are the number of species that appear in the plot and the control, respectively. Previous studies have shown that human disturbance has little influence on, or even helps keep high diversity levels (as shown with increases in the SHDI after disturbance events) (Brown, Ernest, Parody, & Haskell, 2001;Schnoor & Olsson, 2010;Gourlet-Fleury et al, 2013). Consequently, the situation of vegetation recovery cannot be evaluated solely by SHDI.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, in the pine and mixed oak-pine forests studied here, ruderals cannot germinate as long as a thick layer of litter and humus covers the mineral soil. Those obstacles vanish wherever animals excavate soil and bury the original forest floor (Mayer et al 2004;Schnoor and Olsson 2010). Seeds of some species like Urtica dioica and Mycelis muralis are particularly adapted to such disturbance episodes.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%