2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2019.121504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of solvation and applied potential on the adsorption behaviors of H, O, OH and H2O on Fe(110) surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is observed that for H* at this coverage, the hollow site yielded the most negative adsorption energy. Much of the previous literature, both computational and experimental, identifies either the hollow or long bridge as the most favorable site [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and, we highlight the small geometric distance distinguishing these two sites. Similarly, OH* and O* were also observed to prefer the hollow site, and for all other coverages on the terrace we assume this site will be most favorable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is observed that for H* at this coverage, the hollow site yielded the most negative adsorption energy. Much of the previous literature, both computational and experimental, identifies either the hollow or long bridge as the most favorable site [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and, we highlight the small geometric distance distinguishing these two sites. Similarly, OH* and O* were also observed to prefer the hollow site, and for all other coverages on the terrace we assume this site will be most favorable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, general fundamental insights of the electrochemical iron interface is needed to further advance the electrowinning process. While there is extensive surface science literature on the interaction of iron with water and its constituent molecules, [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] as well as established bulk iron-water Pourbaix diagrams, 23,[46][47][48] a full unified electrochemical mapping in the form of a surface Pourbaix diagram has yet to be proposed. In the electrocatalysis field where similar challenges of unification have arisen, surface Pourbaix diagrams have been a powerful tool to predict the surface as a function of electrochemical environment and thereby inform selectivity trends (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the optimized Cu species were placed on the surface of the model, and their interaction was simulated. The stability of adsorbates surface could be determined using the adsorption energies (Eads) [28], and the adsorption energy of the adsorbates on the specularite surface was calculated as follows [29][30][31]:…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E ads represents the adsorption energy; E adsorbate/slab represents the energy of the adsorbed specularite (0 0 1) surface; E adsorbate represents the energy of the adsorbate; and E slab represents the energy of the specularite (0 0 1) surface. The more negative the adsorption energy, the stronger the interaction between the adsorbates and the specularite surface [31,32].…”
Section: The Effect Of Cu Species Adsorbed On the Structure Of The Specularite (0 0 1) Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%