2010
DOI: 10.1021/es100045y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Solvents and Dosing Procedure on Chemical Toxicity in Cell-Based in Vitro Assays

Abstract: Due to the implementation of new legislation, such as REACh, a dramatic increase of animal use for toxicity testing is expected and the search for alternatives is timely. Cell-based in vitro assays are promising alternatives. However, the behavior of chemicals in these assays is still poorly understood. We set out to quantify the exposure and associated toxicity of chemicals with different physicochemical properties toward a fish gill cell line when different solvents and procedural steps are used to introduce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to have a more precise in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, the use of toxicokinetics data as well as physiologically based toxicokinetics modeling (PBTK) is recommended (Coecke et al, 2013). The nominal concentrations applied to the culture systems may deviate from the actual concentration of the compound due to the occurrence of multiple possible events, such as accumulation, evaporation, binding to plastic and/ or medium components, uptake and metabolism (Blaauboer, 2010;Tanneberger et al, 2010). The combination of toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic approaches has been extensively investigated in the EU funded 7th Framework Project Predict-IV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to have a more precise in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, the use of toxicokinetics data as well as physiologically based toxicokinetics modeling (PBTK) is recommended (Coecke et al, 2013). The nominal concentrations applied to the culture systems may deviate from the actual concentration of the compound due to the occurrence of multiple possible events, such as accumulation, evaporation, binding to plastic and/ or medium components, uptake and metabolism (Blaauboer, 2010;Tanneberger et al, 2010). The combination of toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic approaches has been extensively investigated in the EU funded 7th Framework Project Predict-IV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…intended) chemical concentrations. However, recent studies show that measurements of external exposure are more appropriate than nominal concentrations due to the number of competing processes occurring in the culture well, like sorption to various compartments in a well or evaporation [3], [6], [8]. Yet, external concentrations as dose metric are still only a surrogate which may impede interpretation and extrapolation of toxicological effects because internal concentrations are thought to give rise to the biologically effective dose [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, hydrophobic and volatile chemicals have proven to be difficult to dose and obtain reliable results for in cell-based assays (5). One possible reason for this is that the free concentration of a test chemical can be much lower than the nominal concentration and can vary considerably between assays and over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%