2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of some environmental parameters on catalase activity measured in the mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) exposed to lindane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
40
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, CAT activity was induced again after 42 days of exposure, it may be due to the ROS generated by the increasing concentration of DDE and DDD, the metabolites of DDT. The results were in agreement with previous reports of the up-regulating of CAT activity in macrophytes and mussels exposed to lindane and endosulfan [36,44].…”
Section: Cat and Gst Activity Of Earthworms Exposed To Soils Spiked Wsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, CAT activity was induced again after 42 days of exposure, it may be due to the ROS generated by the increasing concentration of DDE and DDD, the metabolites of DDT. The results were in agreement with previous reports of the up-regulating of CAT activity in macrophytes and mussels exposed to lindane and endosulfan [36,44].…”
Section: Cat and Gst Activity Of Earthworms Exposed To Soils Spiked Wsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…By transforming the superoxide anion to H 2 O 2 , SOD, in fact, represents the first defensive enzyme that organisms use to limit the toxicity of ROS. However, the antioxidant defence pathway was not blocked because other enzymes, such as those included into the perixosomes, may generate H 2 O 2 (Khessiba et al 2005), which is the selective substrate for CAT and GPx. Overall, it can explain the significant (P \ 0.05) activation of these antioxidant enzymes, particularly GPx, which showed a significant (P \ 0.05) activation at the end of each exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interestingly, some of these biomarkers were modulated depending on the season and, this, for the three contaminated sites. Therefore, modulations on biomarker responses could be due to (1) abiotic or biotic factors in this area such as temperature, salinity, pH, or food supply (Khessiba et al 2005;Kirchin et al 1992;Prevodnik et al 2007;Verlecar et al 2007), (2) modulations of contaminant contents through seasons (Niyogi et al 2001), and/or (3) an additive effect of temperature variations and contaminant contents in these areas. Indeed, Ringwood et al (2002) reported a correlation between lysosomal destabilization in deployed oysters Crassostrea virginica and tissue metal concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%