Anthocyanin synthesis, hair formation, and the synthesis of ascorbic acid oxidase are an phytochrome-medisted reactions occurring in the hypocotyl of mustard (Sinapis alba L.), controlled by phytochrome actully located in the hypocotyl. A comparison of these three reactions showed that in certain respects they differ greatly in their response to light. The ability of the seedling to respond to light by showing the three responses was strongly influenced by the state of development of the seedling. White light given very early after seed imbibition was unable to evoke any of the three reactions. By 50 hours after imbibition, all systems were fully inducible by light. The addition of actinomycin D to a fully competent seedling coincident with illumination strongly inhibited the development of all three responses. In contrast, the addition of cordycepin at this time inhibited the synthesis of anthocyanin and ascorbic acid oxidase but had no effect on hair formation. Cycdoheximide inhibited all three responses when given up to several hours after light.This suggests the necessity for RNA and protein synthesis for lightinduced expression of these reactions, and that the RNA species involved in the three reactions may have differing degrees of polyadenylation. The lag period between the onset of light and the first display of the response was 3 hours for anthocyanin and ascorbic acid oxidase synthesis, and about 5 hours for hair formation. Amounts of lght sufficient to give large increases in the levels of ascorbic acid oxidase and hair formation gave a much smaUler increase in anthocyania synthesis. Hair formation and ascorbic acid oxidase synthesis showed a much greater sensitivity to induction at early stages of seedling development than did anthocyanin synthesis. Following an inductive light period, anthocyanin synthesis was sensitive to far red light inhibition for a period twice as long as the other two reactions. The differences in the response of the three reactions to light sggest that the phytochrome-mediated reactions which control their development also differ.There has been much speculation on the mode of action of phytochrome (6,23,(25)(26)(27)32) particularly in regard to the nature of the primary reaction (25-27). Although various aspects of different phytochrome-controlled reactions have been compared (8,23,(25)(26)(27), no previous investigation has examined the influence of all of the parameters described in this study, on three different responses, occurring at the same time in the same organ. It is essential that such a comparison be conducted on reactions which occur in the same organ since different organs of a seedling respond differently to the formation of Pfr (23). Therefore, variations in the phytochrome control of various reactions in different organs could well reflect the nature of the organs involved or the stage of seedling development rather than the inductive processes per se.In the present study, the induction and development of three different reactions in the hypocotyl of ...