2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00825.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on forage yield, nitrogen‐ and water‐use efficiency and nutritive value of an annual triple‐crop complementary forage rotation

Abstract: Complementary forage rotation (CFR) systems based on non-limiting inputs of fertilizer nitrogen (N) (600 kg N ha )1 ) are perceived as uneconomic. An experiment was carried out in Australia to investigate the effects of rates and timing of N fertilizer and sowing date on yield, nutrient-use efficiency and nutritive value of a triple-crop (maize, forage rape, field peas) CFR system. Treatments were early-and late-sown maize grown with 0 or 135 kg fertilizer N ha )1 pre-sowing (N1) and 0, 79 or 158 kg N ha )1 po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with previous studies for other crops species e.g. maize (Islam & Garcia 2012), smooth brome grass and orchard grass (Zemenchik & Albrecht 2002). Although there were marginal differences in DM yield between the 100 and 200 kg N ha −1 crops at the final harvest, these results highlight the opportunity of increasing efficiency by reducing total N input and reducing environmental pollution under fodder beet crops.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are consistent with previous studies for other crops species e.g. maize (Islam & Garcia 2012), smooth brome grass and orchard grass (Zemenchik & Albrecht 2002). Although there were marginal differences in DM yield between the 100 and 200 kg N ha −1 crops at the final harvest, these results highlight the opportunity of increasing efficiency by reducing total N input and reducing environmental pollution under fodder beet crops.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The aNUE of 34-93 kg DM kg −1 N applied in the current experiment was within the range of 41-140 kg DM kg −1 N applied (when recalculated excluding the yield of the control plots) for other forage crops e.g. silage maize (Islam & Garcia 2012) and the 29-96 kg DM kg −1 N for forage kale (Fletcher et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…During the second growth, a linear response of the N topdressing supply was observed (Figure 1c), with a 310% increase between the lowest and the highest N doses used for the topdressing. The response to the N rates observed during the second growth reaffirms the need to adjust the N rate and the application period to coincide with peak absorption by the grass and the improvement possible from use of the residual N from the previous crops (Islam and Garcia, 2012).…”
Section: Shoot Dry Matter Production Of Ruzi Grassmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The use of complementary forage systems based on FCS as an option to maximize WP was reported in south-eastern Australia under non-limiting N and water conditions by Garcia et al (2008) and Islam and Garcia (2012) winter crops/maize triple crops (forage rape, persian clover [T. resupinatum L.], and field peas [Pisum sativum L.] as winter crops). These authors reported WP values ranging 3.4-6.1 g m -2 mm -1 for different N rates and sowing dates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%