2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69078-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Spatial Structure and Reduced Growth Rates on Evolution in Bacterial Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to spatial structure, bacteria that grow in biofilms only compete locally with their neighbors, which protracts selective sweeps and leads to increased genotypic and phenotypic variation within a population [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] . Additionally, the gradients of nutrients and electron acceptors cause habitat heterogeneity that results in local adaptation of subpopulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to spatial structure, bacteria that grow in biofilms only compete locally with their neighbors, which protracts selective sweeps and leads to increased genotypic and phenotypic variation within a population [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] . Additionally, the gradients of nutrients and electron acceptors cause habitat heterogeneity that results in local adaptation of subpopulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical work has considered the impact of spatial structure through habitat fragmentation on trait evolution ( Cheptou et al, 2017 ; Urban et al, 2008 ), how population subdivision modulates the extent of adaptive change ( Bailey et al, 2021 ; Baym et al, 2016 ; Chao & Levin, 1981 ; Habets et al, 2006 , 2007 ; Korona et al, 1994 ; Kryazhimskiy et al, 2012 ; Miralles et al, 1999 ; Nahum et al, 2015 ; Perfeito et al, 2007 ; Zhang et al, 2011 ) and community resilience ( Limdi et al, 2018 ). Other work in microbiology has examined the emergence and fate of diversity in spatially structured environments associated with colony growth or biofilms ( Borer et al, 2020 ; Celik Ozgen et al, 2018 ; France et al, 2018 , 2019 ; Kerr et al, 2002 ; Nadell et al, 2010 , 2016 ; Steenackers et al, 2016 ; Trubenová et al, 2022 ) but lacks explicit descriptions of spatial structure or conflates it with variation in conditions of growth that generate divergent selection ( Chen & Kassen, 2020 ; Leale & Kassen, 2018 ). Missingare explicit tests of theory on how the spatial arrangement of populations in space impacts the dynamics of adaptive evolution, including the rate of spread of a beneficial mutation and the probability of fixation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although growth rates and carrying capacities are historically used as part of definitions of “fitness” in the laboratory, real world fitness of microbes is often weakly associated with these parameters (Concepción-Acevedo et al 2015 , Momeni et al 2017 , Bansept et al 2021 ). Instead, fitness in a spatially structured environment with biotic interactions is more often a function of physical and social interactions, where spatial scales and interaction structures are critical aspects of selection (Hansen et al 2007 , France et al 2018 , Liu et al 2019 , Gorter et al 2020 , Conwill et al 2022 , Hoces et al 2022 ). Investigations of realistically structured populations, where temporal and spatial dynamics are considered explicitly, are important for understanding microbial evolution and intraspecies diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%