TENCON '97 Brisbane - Australia. Proceedings of IEEE TENCON '97. IEEE Region 10 Annual Conference. Speech and Image Technologie
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.1997.647276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of speech coding on text-dependent speaker recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, CELP consists of two stages (please refer to [9][10] for complete coder details): Linear Prediction (LP) analysis followed by an adaptive and fixed codebook vector quantization of the excitation (error residual) signal. AMR (at 8kHz) utilizes a 10 th order LP analysis process and AMR-WB (at 16kHz) 16 th order LP, given by: (1) where â i denotes the ith LP coefficient. LP coefficients are calculated for every analysis frame, where both AMR and AMR-WB use 20ms frames.…”
Section: Amr and Amr-wb Speech Codecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In brief, CELP consists of two stages (please refer to [9][10] for complete coder details): Linear Prediction (LP) analysis followed by an adaptive and fixed codebook vector quantization of the excitation (error residual) signal. AMR (at 8kHz) utilizes a 10 th order LP analysis process and AMR-WB (at 16kHz) 16 th order LP, given by: (1) where â i denotes the ith LP coefficient. LP coefficients are calculated for every analysis frame, where both AMR and AMR-WB use 20ms frames.…”
Section: Amr and Amr-wb Speech Codecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of mobile telephony speech compression on speech parameters has been previously studied: Phythian et al [1] found the Code-Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) and Linear Prediction (LP) based GSM speech coders to negatively impact the vowel Fpatterns and fundamental frequency (F0). Further, McClelland [2] found an increase of up to 30Hz on F0 estimations from mobile telephony over landline quality speech, whilst Byrne and Foulkes [3] found 29% higher vowel F1 formants from mobile telephony speech compared to direct speech recordings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the rapid development of network technology, the speech is encoded with compression for effective transmit, and the bit rate is relatively low, which results in the distortion of speech signal and the decline of speaker recognition performance. Particularly, when the condition of training and testing is codec mismatch, the performance is even worse [3][4][5]. The compensation method of audio coding influence has been attracting more attentions of a variety of researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [10], there are two methods for solving AR equations, autocorrelation method and covariance method. Out of these two, autocorrelation is preferred because it gives somewhat stable filters and is computationally efficient [10]. AR equations for autocorrelation method are:…”
Section: Lpc-an Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where R is Toeplitz matrix, a is the vector of the LPC coefficients and r is the autocorrelation. The autocorrelation sequence is given by The redundancy of AR equations can efficiently be computed by Levinson Derbin Regression [10].…”
Section: Lpc-an Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%