1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(98)00558-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of SR 141716A after acute or chronic cannabinoid administration in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, this preparation may serve as an in vitro model for cannabinoid dependence. In line with the observation of Guagnini and colleagues77 is a finding by Lichtman and colleagues78 that one of the withdrawal signs induced by SR141716A in Δ 9 -THC tolerant dogs is diarrhoea. It is noteworthy however that SR141716A (1 μM) has been reported not to induce “withdrawal” contractions in resting (+)-WIN55212 tolerant guinea pig MPLM 76…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Signs Of Tolerance and Dependencesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Accordingly, this preparation may serve as an in vitro model for cannabinoid dependence. In line with the observation of Guagnini and colleagues77 is a finding by Lichtman and colleagues78 that one of the withdrawal signs induced by SR141716A in Δ 9 -THC tolerant dogs is diarrhoea. It is noteworthy however that SR141716A (1 μM) has been reported not to induce “withdrawal” contractions in resting (+)-WIN55212 tolerant guinea pig MPLM 76…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Signs Of Tolerance and Dependencesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Animal studies lend some credibility to this theory; however, results are not consistently reproducible in human studies. Additionally, many inferential hypotheses were identified that attribute different aspects of CHS to a myriad of dysregulatory issues at CB-1 receptors throughout the body (brain, gastrointestinal tract, and vasculature) [97,98,102,105,133,[135][136][137]. The experimental evidence behind these inferences illustrates the complexity of the pathophysiology of CHS and raises many additional questions.…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Chsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients susceptible to developing CHS may have genetic variation in their metabolic enzymes resulting in toxic levels of cannabinoid metabolites [131] Very low Δ9-THC may act as a partial agonist on CB1 receptors and thus relatively antagonize the effects of full endogenous agonists on these receptors, thus precipitating sudden withdrawal and hyperemesis in sensitive patients [97,105] Very low THC causes dilation of splanchnic vasculature, resulting in CHS. Hot bathing leads to peripheral venodilation and shunts blood away from the splanchnic bed, resulting in symptom improvement [102,137] Very low validity of our findings is limited by the possibility of missing articles from our search strategy.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavioral profile of anandamide is somewhat different, in that it produced little static ataxia and incoordination but did produce a loss of muscle tone and considerable sedation. However, the effects of both classes of compounds are reversed by CB1 receptor antagonists [Lichtman et al, 1998]. In rodents, which also have a relatively high density of CB1 receptors in the cerebellar molecular layer, D…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%