2013
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2012.301117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of State Medical Marijuana Laws on Adolescent Marijuana Use

Abstract: Our results suggest that, in the states assessed here, MMLs have not measurably affected adolescent marijuana use in the first few years after their enactment. Longer-term results, after MMLs are more fully implemented, might be different.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
140
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
140
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the federal level, the Obama Administration has instructed prosecutors and law enforcement officials not to focus on individuals "whose actions are unclear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of medical marijuana". Thus, the shift in federal position prompted a drastic increase in registration for medical marijuana, particularly in Colorado [40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Cost For Marijuana?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the federal level, the Obama Administration has instructed prosecutors and law enforcement officials not to focus on individuals "whose actions are unclear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of medical marijuana". Thus, the shift in federal position prompted a drastic increase in registration for medical marijuana, particularly in Colorado [40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Cost For Marijuana?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For MMLs in particular, Maryland (MD) is an interesting state in this respect. A law was passed in MD providing an affirmative defense for patients, physicians, and caregivers ; however, the law is very restrictive, so some authors conclude that MD does have a MML (Pacula et al 2015;Lynne-Landsman et al 2013) and other authors conclude that MD does not (Anderson et al 2015;Wen et al 2015;Harper et al 2012). Since there are delays between when a law is passed, when it is made effective, and when it is implemented on the ground, researchers need to be careful to identify the relevant date of interest for the units in the treatment group.…”
Section: Issues In Defining the Intervention For Marijuana Policy Anamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the solid line and dashed line for the intervention group is the estimated treatment effect. For a helpful illustration of the control and intervention groups in a DiD design when units are treated at different times ('switching replications' design), see Lynne-Landsman et al (2013).…”
Section: What To Do When Randomly Assigning Laws To Jurisdictions Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the epidemiologic data are not consistent across states and time periods, with the exception of Michigan and New Mexico, in all states where medical marijuana has been legalized, marijuana use by minors has been stable or has decreased. 3 Youth substance use rates depend on a number of factors, including legal status, availability and ease of access of the substance, and perception of harm. For example, although tobacco is easily accessible, youth tobacco use rates have decreased substantially since the 1990s, in conjunction with aggressive public health campaigns warning of the medical consequences of smoking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%