Effects of Stereo and Screen Size on the Legibility of Three-Dimensional Streamtube Visualization

Abstract

We report the impact of display characteristics (stereo and size) on task performance in diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (DMRI) in a user study with 12 participants. The hypotheses were that (1) adding stereo and increasing display size would improve task accuracy and reduce completion time, and (2) the greater the complexity of a spatial task, the greater the benefits of an improved display. Thus we expected to see greater performance gains when detailed visual reasoning was required. Participants used dense streamtube visualizations to perform five representative tasks: (1) determine the higher average fractional anisotropy (FA) values between two regions, (2) find the endpoints of fiber tracts, (3) name a bundle, (4) mark a brain lesion, and (5) judge if tracts belong to the same bundle. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found the task completion time was not improved by the use of the larger display and that performance accuracy was hurt rather than helped by the introduction of stereo in our study with dense DMRI data. Bigger was not always better. Thus cautious should be taken when selecting displays for scientific visualization applications. We explored the results further using the body-scale unit and subjective size and stereo experiences.

Validation of SplitVectors Encoding for Quantitative Visualization of Large-Magnitude-Range Vector Fields

“…To understand legibility, Chen et al studied pattern recognition in dense diffusion tensor MRI datasets and suggested that participants would not be able to see patterns when density was high, implicating the stereo-occlusion tradeoff [31]. That study expands consideration of the dense conditions.…”

Diffusion MRI visualization

“…Initial attempts have been made to use immersive virtual environments or large and stereoscopic screens to improve tractography visualization, but it has so far proven difficult to demonstrate a clear benefit in terms of task accuracy or completion time 2 Dense visualization …”

Toward A Deep Understanding of What Makes a Scientific Visualization Memorable

“…However, some features cannot be applied in SciVis, because data from infographics are mostly discrete, in contrast to continuous scientific data related to variety of physical phenomenons. For example, the concept of dataink ratio suitable to measure density in information visualization would be ill-defined in spatial data in terms of legibility [5]. Though pictograms outperformed plain charts and texts in attracting viewers' attention [12] and led to higher memorability scores [3], text displays also have many forms in spatial data visualizations [6] [33].…”