1962
DOI: 10.1093/brain/85.3.487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Stimulation of Frontal Cortex and Hippocampus on Behaviour in the Monkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study confirms and extends the previous results of Stamm (1961) and Weiskrantz, Mihailovic, & Gross (1960, 1962. However, the finding that frontal stimulation disrupted an overtrained alternation habit in a WGTA and also, under certain conditions, in an automatic apparatus seems incompatible with the view that such stimulation affects the "learning" but not the "memory" of this habit.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present study confirms and extends the previous results of Stamm (1961) and Weiskrantz, Mihailovic, & Gross (1960, 1962. However, the finding that frontal stimulation disrupted an overtrained alternation habit in a WGTA and also, under certain conditions, in an automatic apparatus seems incompatible with the view that such stimulation affects the "learning" but not the "memory" of this habit.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Four immature rhesus monkeys were implanted with Delgado-type cortical plate electrodes as described by stamm (1961) and Weiskrantz et al (1962). Three pairs of electrodes were placed, bilaterally, on the banks of sulcus principalis.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weiskrantz,Mihailovic,and Gross (38,39) a severe deficit on delayed-alternation but not on auditory-discrimination performance when they stimulated a region of sulcus principalis. However, when they stimulated a part of the arcuate sulcus they obtained no impairment on either task.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With parameters specifically chosen to avoid at least overt behavioural seizures, or with spreading depression confined to the hippocampus, a different picture emerges. No disruption was seen in the performance of go-no-go discrimination, learning set and delayed alternation (Weiskrantz, Mihailovic, and Gross 1962), nor in a position habit (Olds and Olds 1961), nor in a T-maze brightness discrimination (Grossman and Mountford 1964), nor in lever-press avoidance (Margules and Stein 1968).…”
Section: The Effects Of Stimulation Upon Performancementioning
confidence: 90%