2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Stimulus Type and Strategy on Mental Rotation Network: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis

Abstract: We can predict how an object would look like if we were to see it from different viewpoints. The brain network governing mental rotation (MR) has been studied using a variety of stimuli and tasks instructions. By using activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis we tested whether different MR networks can be modulated by the type of stimulus (body vs. non-body parts) or by the type of tasks instructions (motor imagery-based vs. non-motor imagery-based MR instructions). Testing for the bodily and non-b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
107
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
19
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the presently included updating tasks incorporated button-press responses, consistent with involvement of post-error motor response processes. Thus, it is possible that the present involvement of cerebellar activity reflects a task specific process, as have been highlighted as important factors to consider in this kind of functional neuroimaging analysis (Chein et al, 2011; Tomasino and Gremese, 2016). Considering such processes, it is interesting to note that a particular role for cross-modal integration of information for WM has been highlighted (Prabhakaran et al, 2000; Zhang et al, 2004; Repovs and Baddeley, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the presently included updating tasks incorporated button-press responses, consistent with involvement of post-error motor response processes. Thus, it is possible that the present involvement of cerebellar activity reflects a task specific process, as have been highlighted as important factors to consider in this kind of functional neuroimaging analysis (Chein et al, 2011; Tomasino and Gremese, 2016). Considering such processes, it is interesting to note that a particular role for cross-modal integration of information for WM has been highlighted (Prabhakaran et al, 2000; Zhang et al, 2004; Repovs and Baddeley, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not significant, higher AVP was trending towards relating to worse performance on verbal abilities in men. However, in women higher AVP was associated with lower efficiency in the left parietal cortex, which is important for visuospatial abilities (Tomasino and Gremese 2015). Consequently, AVP levels may in part explain why women on average perform worse than men on visuospatial abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance it is required in mentally transforming spatial configurations through mental rotation; for a meta-analysis [22]. Interestingly, the incidence of broken rules in a visuo-spatial task such as the maze-learning test was also related to the right parieto-temporal cortex [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%