2022
DOI: 10.3329/bjz.v50i2.62056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Stocking Density on Production Performance of nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in grow-out Culture Cages

Abstract: A 120-day cage grow-out production performance of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus was conducted in the Dakatia river, Echoli, Chandpur to identify an optimal stocking density. The three stocking densities were used at 30, 50, and 70 tilapia m-3 under three treatments with triplicate. The initial average weight of tilapia fingerlings at 32.31±9.59 g was stocked. Final weight, specific growth rate, and survival were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the 30 tilapia m-3 stocking density than those in the 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Benefit cost ratio demonstrated the substantial (p<0.05) differences across treatments. The BCR values that Kunda et al (2021) and Hossain et al (2022) acquired were significantly lower than our latest findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Benefit cost ratio demonstrated the substantial (p<0.05) differences across treatments. The BCR values that Kunda et al (2021) and Hossain et al (2022) acquired were significantly lower than our latest findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…According to the study, net profit declined as stocking density increased, which was consistent with Dasuki et al (2013) and Hossain et al (2022). The BCR for every treatment exhibits a significant heterogeneity in density.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…~ 36 ~ Although these authors [19] mention that increasing the density modifies the size of the fish, the health of both the fish and the system increases the use of water and the replacement to maintain a good quality, the sedimentation of organic matter increases and consequently increases mortality and decreases the efficiency of growth and productivity of the system. The same is demonstrated in the work done by Mohamed et al., [20] , Robiul et al., [21] , and Sapkota et al., [22] , where all productive and survival values decrease with increasing planting density. In the case of this experiment with Biofloc, all of the above is not reflected in a great way neither in the growth efficiency of the organisms nor in the productivity of the system because the system used produces a continuously present food biomass on which the fish can feed, in addition to the formation of a heterotrophic bacterial biomass capable of decomposing nitrogenous compounds that can be detrimental to both the water quality of the system and the physiology of the fish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In this study, the water quality variables of cages in the River Dakatia were within reasonable limits for O. niloticus (Ross, 2000). Additionally, the quality parameters, i.e., water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, free CO2, total alkalinity, total hardness, ammonia-N, and NO2-N, were more or less similar to the following previous studiesin the River Dakatia, Meghna, Gumti, Titas and Hoara, Bangladesh (Hossain et al, 2022;Ahmed et al, 2014).…”
Section: Water Quality Parameterssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These were done for all cages between 08:30 to 11:00 hours. The determination procedure of these water quality variables was described by Hossain et al (2022). In brief, water temperature (°C) was estimated with a centigrade thermometer.…”
Section: Water Quality Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%