2016
DOI: 10.5194/tc-10-1591-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of stratified active layers on high-altitude permafrost warming: a case study on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Abstract: Abstract. Seasonally variable thermal conductivity in active layers is one important factor that controls the thermal state of permafrost. The common assumption is that this conductivity is considerably lower in the thawed than in the frozen state, λ t /λ f < 1. Using a 9-year dataset from the QinghaiTibet Plateau (QTP) in conjunction with the GEOtop model, we demonstrate that the ratio λ t /λ f may approach or even exceed 1. This can happen in thick (> 1.5 m) active layers with strong seasonal total water con… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6). Snow blowing is parameterized as wind compaction in 1-D (Pomeroy et al, 1993) for all the terrain types except the tall shrub site.…”
Section: Model Settings and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). Snow blowing is parameterized as wind compaction in 1-D (Pomeroy et al, 1993) for all the terrain types except the tall shrub site.…”
Section: Model Settings and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitzbon et al (2019) recently extended the thermal-only simulator Cryogrid 3 (Westermann et al, 2016) to include a simplified hydrology scheme that avoids solving the computationally demanding Richards equation. All of these models remove the requirement for imposing surface conditions and as such offer the potential for advancing understanding of permafrost thermal hydrology as an integrated surface/subsurface system (Harp et al, 2015;Atchley et al, 2016;Pan et al, 2016;Sjöberg et al, 2016;Jafarov et al, 2018;Abolt et al, 2018;Nitzbon et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GEOtop (version 2.0), a physically-based numerical model, is used for this demonstrator application because it describes the complex abiotic processes in permafrost environments well (e.g. Endrizzi and Marsh, 2010;Gubler et al, 2013;Endrizzi et al, 2014;Pan et al, 2016). It represents the heat and water transfer in soil as well as the energy transfer between the soil and the atmosphere.…”
Section: Process-based Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%