Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4791-4_297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Stress on the Probability of Detection for Magnetic Flux Leakage Inspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 presents the interacting situation most often encountered in practice: two corrosion pits, aligned along the pipe axis. Most field inspections use a magnetisation of the pipe wall in the same direction (12) . In Figure 1, the shaded zone experiences lower flux density than the bulk of the material, since the defects mutually shield one another from the applied magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 presents the interacting situation most often encountered in practice: two corrosion pits, aligned along the pipe axis. Most field inspections use a magnetisation of the pipe wall in the same direction (12) . In Figure 1, the shaded zone experiences lower flux density than the bulk of the material, since the defects mutually shield one another from the applied magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As its name indicates, the damage from outside forces is typically caused by external forces, unstable ground, excavation and construction equipment. Together, we call these forms of damage as mechanical damage [4].…”
Section: Data Maintained By the Us Department Of Transportation (Domentioning
confidence: 99%