1980
DOI: 10.1378/chest.77.2.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Suctioning on Mucociliary Transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…22 This maneuver can injure the tracheal mucosa, 23 decrease lung volume leading to hypoxia, 24 trigger cardiac arrhythmias, 25 and increase intracranial pressure. 26 In addition, the use of blind suctioning has also been associated with further impairment of tracheal mucociliary clearance function 27 together with dislodging emboli of pathogens from the ETT biofilm to the lower airway. 28 Several novel dedicated medical devices have been developed for the specific purpose of ETT cleaning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 This maneuver can injure the tracheal mucosa, 23 decrease lung volume leading to hypoxia, 24 trigger cardiac arrhythmias, 25 and increase intracranial pressure. 26 In addition, the use of blind suctioning has also been associated with further impairment of tracheal mucociliary clearance function 27 together with dislodging emboli of pathogens from the ETT biofilm to the lower airway. 28 Several novel dedicated medical devices have been developed for the specific purpose of ETT cleaning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…performed invasive procedure in ventilated newborn infants, and is important to maintain ETT patency and to prevent complications of secretion retention (1,2). It is associated, however, with the potential for significant adverse effects including loss of lung volume, hypoxemia, and localized injury to the tracheobronchial tree (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: E Ndotracheal Tube (Ett) Suction Is the Most Frequentlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their airways may be particularly sensitive to insults. Perhaps the endotracheal tube or the suction catheter mechanically irritated the upper airways.7 8 The tubes used were polyvinyl tubes (Portex). It is unlikely that any plasticiser would elute from these fairly firm tubes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%