1991
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90320-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of supergravity-induced electroweak breaking on rare b-decays and mixings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

27
871
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 703 publications
(899 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
27
871
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• BR(b → sγ) and A CP (b → sγ): It has been known for quite some time that b → sγ provides important tests of supersymmetry [227,228]. The leading SM contribution to the branching ratio appears at one loop level, with the characteristic Cabibbo suppression.…”
Section: Constraints From Fc Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• BR(b → sγ) and A CP (b → sγ): It has been known for quite some time that b → sγ provides important tests of supersymmetry [227,228]. The leading SM contribution to the branching ratio appears at one loop level, with the characteristic Cabibbo suppression.…”
Section: Constraints From Fc Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superpartners and charged Higgs loops generically contribute to b → sγ, at a level competitive with the SM, with contributions that depend strongly on the parameters of L sof t , as well as µ and tan β. This process has been most often studied in the MFV scenario at LO [228,233], in certain limits at NLO [234], and including large tan β enhanced two-loop supersymmetry contributions [235,236], and all-order resummation of tan β enhanced QCD corrections [237].…”
Section: Constraints From Fc Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These contributions can either increase or decrease the b ! s decay rate compared with the Standard Model expectation [20,21].…”
Section: Radiative C Harmless Decaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients C 0,e f f 7,8 (µ b ) have an important property and it is that they are quite similar in many interesting extensions of the SM, such as 2HDM or the MSSM [21][22][23] and therefore it is possible to parametrize the new contributions using new fuctions C 0,1 i, j (µ W ) with i = 7, 8 and j = YY, XY . These functions depend on the unknown parameter m ± H and also on the size and sign fo the couplings X and Y that in the case of the model III under study they are X = −λ bb , and Y = λ tt .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%