2006
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[517:eosfop]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Supplemental Feeding on Physiological Condition of Northern Bobwhite in South Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
34
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we found no significant difference in the relative abundance of raptors or activity of mammalian predators on each study site in either year. Doerr and Silvy (2002) also found no difference in relative abundance of predators (avian and mammalian) between sites with and without supplemental feed. However, our predator survey results may be due to the fact that baiting was too brief (2 months on single-road bait) to result in a difference in predator abundance or activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we found no significant difference in the relative abundance of raptors or activity of mammalian predators on each study site in either year. Doerr and Silvy (2002) also found no difference in relative abundance of predators (avian and mammalian) between sites with and without supplemental feed. However, our predator survey results may be due to the fact that baiting was too brief (2 months on single-road bait) to result in a difference in predator abundance or activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…For example, Robel and Kemp (1997) documented that number of days with snow cover of >10 cm and temperatures < -5 o C during January were correlated (r>0.69) with bobwhite mortality and were the best predictors of winter mortality. Townsend 406 Wildlife Society Bulletin 2004, 32(2):401-411 Doerr and Silvy (2002) reported that winter sur-vival in southern Texas (Jim Hogg and San Patricio counties) was not greater on supplemental feed sites compared to control sites. However, during our study in year 2, survival was higher on the treatment site compared to the control site during the post-feeding period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bobwhites prefer to use habitats with extensive woody cover, presumably because predation risk is reduced (Williams et al 2000, Guthery et al 2001. Provision of supplementary food in feeders or food plots may increase winter survival if bobwhites are better able to cope with inclement weather with additional food or body reserves Kemp 1997, Doerr andSilvy 2006). However, potential benefits of improved cover and supplemental feeding could be negated by higher mortality rates if hunters or natural predators concentrate their effort near food plots or habitats preferred by bobwhites (Roseberry 1979, Williams et al 2000, Madison et al 2002, Haines et al 2004, Hardin et al 2005).…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Demographic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many, the supplementation of feed during these periods has seemed a logical step in addressing resource concerns (Hernández et al , Rollins ). Using bobwhites as a model species and survival as a proxy for the overall fitness of individuals, researchers have tested whether supplemental feeding, as a management strategy to address food limitations, can provide appreciable survival benefits for local and regional populations (Ellis et al , Doerr and Silvy , Buckley et al ). Traditionally wildlife managers have used food plots (Joselyn , Robel , Robel et al , Madison et al ), stationary feeders (Dumke , DeMaso et al , Guthery et al ), and road baiting (Haines et al , Hernández et al ), or a combination thereof (Townsend et al ), to improve the survival rates of northern bobwhites or enhance hunting opportunities (Schulz et al ); the results have been mixed with a majority of studies indicating conventional feeding regimes are not a viable strategy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%