2011
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2011.10238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Supplementation of Probiotics on the Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Faecal Microflora in Growing-finishing Pigs

Abstract: Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of dietary supplementation of Bacillus, Saccharomyces and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on performance and nutrient digestibility in grower and finisher pigs. In Exp. 1, 80 pigs (32 females and 48 males), 28.7±0.9 kg body weight (BW), were randomly divided into 4 treatment groups balanced for sex and weight (5 pigs per pen, 4 pens per treatment). They were fed one of four diets: a basal grower (20-50 kg BW) and finisher (>50 kg BW) diet without any addition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
65
1
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
65
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the supplementation of probiotics did not reduce enteric bacterial counts nor increased lactic acid bacterial (LAB) counts in fecal samples (Figure 1). These results are similar to those reported by Giang et al (2011), where how probiotics supplementation affects performance, nutrient digestibility and fecal microflora in growing-finishing pigs was evaluated. The authors reported that inclusion of Bacillus in pig diet did not affect fecal microflora.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, the supplementation of probiotics did not reduce enteric bacterial counts nor increased lactic acid bacterial (LAB) counts in fecal samples (Figure 1). These results are similar to those reported by Giang et al (2011), where how probiotics supplementation affects performance, nutrient digestibility and fecal microflora in growing-finishing pigs was evaluated. The authors reported that inclusion of Bacillus in pig diet did not affect fecal microflora.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, Kritas and Morrison () failed to observe any significant growth performance effects with dietary supplementation of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis product (1,012 CFU/0.45 kg total Bacillus) in pigs. Similarly, Giang, Viet, Ogle, and Lindberg () reported that basal diet supplemented with either Bacillus subtilis H4 (6 × 1,011 CFU/ml) had no effect on the performance in grower‐finisher pigs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…and coliforms counts but had no effect on Lactobacillus counts in weaning pigs. Giang et al . reported that dietary Bacillus supplementation had no effect on faecal Lactobacillus or E. coli counts in growing and finishing pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and coliforms counts but had no effect on Lactobacillus counts in weaning pigs. Giang et al 29 reported that dietary Bacillus supplementation had no effect on faecal Lactobacillus or E. coli counts in growing and finishing pigs. In the present study, dietary B. licheniformis and B. subtilis complex supplementation had no effect on faecal E. coli counts but increased faecal Lactobacillus counts.…”
Section: Faecal Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%