2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surface damage on twinning stress and the stability of twin microstructures of magnetic shape memory alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, the release of this internal stress can drive the single variant to transform back into the initial state prior to applying stress, i.e., re-creating multi-variants upon mechanical unloading. A similar hypothesis was advanced to explain the $4% recovery observed in a 5M Ni-Mn-Ga single crystal, where obstacles to the twins were attributed the rough surface of the sample [36]. Thus, the superelastic behavior of the present wires can be attributed to the existence of the c precipitates (and possibly also surface roughness).…”
Section: Mechanism For Fluctuations and Superelasticitymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Subsequently, the release of this internal stress can drive the single variant to transform back into the initial state prior to applying stress, i.e., re-creating multi-variants upon mechanical unloading. A similar hypothesis was advanced to explain the $4% recovery observed in a 5M Ni-Mn-Ga single crystal, where obstacles to the twins were attributed the rough surface of the sample [36]. Thus, the superelastic behavior of the present wires can be attributed to the existence of the c precipitates (and possibly also surface roughness).…”
Section: Mechanism For Fluctuations and Superelasticitymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Measured transient thrusts with a 10M Ni-Mn-Ga single crystal rod with aspect ratio 5 were much higher than those from biological equivalents of the same size, e.g., tadpole tails. By contrast, in MSMA samples with aspect ratio close to or below unity, uniaxial strain due to MFIS, rather than bending, is the dominant response [17] albeit with kinking if only one twin boundary carries the deformation [18,19]. Chmielus et al [20] reported large MFIS in polycrystalline Ni-Mn-Ga foam with single crystalline or bamboo struts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…3(b), the unloading part of the stress-strain curve exhibits a large recovery of nearly 4% when the stress falls below about 5 MPa. Chmielus et al [19] reported that, for a monocrystalline 14M sample with 2.4 Â 3.0 Â 4.4 mm dimensions, large compressive unloading strain recovery of $1% could be attributed to the relatively rough surface of a sample polished with 6 lm diamond slurry. A deformed surface layer impedes twin boundary motion near the surface.…”
Section: Uniaxial Compressive Deformationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In that case a hysteresis as large as 9 K was measured [28]. The small hysteresis seen in the present alloy shall be rather attributed to an artifact resulting from the thermal mass of the sample [29]. This effect can be assumed to increase also the apparent hysteresis of the structural phase transformation, but is neglected here, because this work focuses on the structural and magnetic behavior across the transformation.…”
Section: Transformation Temperatures Derived From Dsc Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%