2015
DOI: 10.1088/0169-5983/47/3/035505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surface roughness and electrokinetic heterogeneity on electroosmotic flow in microchannel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. In the fine‐to‐coarse direction of the surface roughness gradient (electropherograms A–C), the zone of thiourea was fronting (the EOF velocity decreased with an increase in roughness height before detection ) while in the coarse‐to‐fine direction (electropherograms Ai–Ci) it was tailing (the EOF velocity increased with an decrease in roughness height before detection ), similarly as it was described by the mathematical model for a microchannel . At the BGE pH higher than pH 7.0 local changes in pressure zone which make the central flow velocity smaller than that in the near‐wall region already does not affect the peak shape.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. In the fine‐to‐coarse direction of the surface roughness gradient (electropherograms A–C), the zone of thiourea was fronting (the EOF velocity decreased with an increase in roughness height before detection ) while in the coarse‐to‐fine direction (electropherograms Ai–Ci) it was tailing (the EOF velocity increased with an decrease in roughness height before detection ), similarly as it was described by the mathematical model for a microchannel . At the BGE pH higher than pH 7.0 local changes in pressure zone which make the central flow velocity smaller than that in the near‐wall region already does not affect the peak shape.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Local changes in pressure zone are induced that make the central flow velocity smaller than that in the near‐wall region, and significantly reduce the flow rate through the rough microchannel . The induced high‐pressure zone occurs at the front of the rough elements, whereas the low‐pressure zone is in the tail region to satisfy the flow continuity . Simultaneously, the EOF velocity decreases with an increase in roughness height and increases with an increase in roughness length .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stacked micelles and swept analytes migrate into the low-conductivity BGE [3]. Simultaneously, the induced high-pressure zone occurs at the front of the rough elements, whereas the low-pressure zone is in the tail region to satisfy the flow continuity [26,31]. The higher local changes in pressure zone which make the central flow velocity smaller than that in the near-wall region [19,26] does not affect the peak shape in terms of its tailing at BGE pH 7.0.…”
Section: Choice Of Bge Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the reduction of the characteristic scale of the study of fluid motion, a new flow effect was found. e coupling of the electric field force, the flow field, the temperature field and the ion motion within the microchannel, the electroosmotic flow, electrophoresis, induced electroosmotic flow, and other electrical phenomena can be used to achieve microfluidic (microparticle) transport and control [5,6]. Electrokinetic phenomena in microfluidics are caused by the interaction between the applied electric field and the diffusion layer in the electric double layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%