2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Surface Roughness in Squeeze Film Lubrication of Spherical Bearings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slight increment of dispersive component is associated with the physical interaction between testing fluids and the fault surface that consists of asperities or defects like cracks or pores. The cavities on UHMWPE/1.0GO's surface could be enhanced dispersion forces resulting from correlated movements of the electrons on the sample surface, which allow the fluids to have a relatively higher affinity of spreading 63,64 . Meanwhile, it has been recognized that hydrogen bonds can be formed between amino groups and carboxyl groups in protein molecules, allowing the adsorption of proteins to solid surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slight increment of dispersive component is associated with the physical interaction between testing fluids and the fault surface that consists of asperities or defects like cracks or pores. The cavities on UHMWPE/1.0GO's surface could be enhanced dispersion forces resulting from correlated movements of the electrons on the sample surface, which allow the fluids to have a relatively higher affinity of spreading 63,64 . Meanwhile, it has been recognized that hydrogen bonds can be formed between amino groups and carboxyl groups in protein molecules, allowing the adsorption of proteins to solid surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…surface, which allow the fluids to have a relatively higher affinity of spreading. 63,64 Meanwhile, it has been recognized that hydrogen bonds can be formed between amino groups and carboxyl groups in protein molecules, allowing the adsorption of proteins to solid surfaces. Therefore, we believe that the UHMWPE/1.0GO has a higher protein adsorption capacity than other composite samples, even though it showed the least hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Followed by UHMWPE/GO and UHMWPE showed the lowest wettability. The wettability of the sample was likely to be elevated by surface chemical composition on the surface or/and the physical interaction between the FBS and solid surface morphology [28][29]. However, the interactions of the bovine serum with the surface can't be specifically determined by comparing the magnitude of the contact angle alone.…”
Section: Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicated that the physical interaction between the testing fluids is mainly contributed to the hydrophobicity reduction of the UHMWPE composites as opposed to their surface chemistry. The physical interaction between the testing fluids and the surface morphology of the samples was likely to be encouraged due to the existence of temporary electrons on the sample surface [28][29], which allow the fluids to have a relatively Fig. 2.…”
Section: Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the year 1962, Dowson [6] unified the various attempts in generalizing the Reynolds Equation by considering the variation of fluid properties across as well as along the fluid film thickness by neglecting the slip effects at the bearing surfaces. Since then many researchers have studied the effects of viscosity variation in lubricated systems by considering Reynolds Equation [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%