2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-015-0304-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surface shapes and geotechnical conditions on the ground motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This function reflects the amplitude attenuation and phase delay in the direction extending to infinity. The mapping functions of the element are given as (Chuhan and Chongbin 1987;Düzgün and Budak 2015):…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of the Coupled Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function reflects the amplitude attenuation and phase delay in the direction extending to infinity. The mapping functions of the element are given as (Chuhan and Chongbin 1987;Düzgün and Budak 2015):…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of the Coupled Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e damage of earthquake was found to be very selective of site conditions [10][11][12][13][14] which generally refer to local geological conditions, such as the near-surface soil layer, topography, and fracture zones. Existing studies [10,[15][16][17][18] have shown that the impact of site conditions on seismic damage is due to their significant ground motion amplification or deamplification effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qiu et al [8] studied the influence of slope shape on the seismic response of gravel-soil slopes under conditions of oblique incident seismic waves. Düzgün and Budak [9] studied the differences in seismic responses between a single-faced slope and a ridge. Zhou et al [2] studied the influence of different seismic coefficients on the stability of convex slope under 3D conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%