2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09829-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sustained attention and video lecture types on learning performances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mayer [15] and Pi et al [18] argued that the inclusion of an instructor's image would not have a strong impact on learning. On the other hand, Kokoc et al [10] found that picture-in-picture video lectures with the instructor's image yield improved performance. To minimize distraction, our environment continues not to show the instructor's image.…”
Section: User Study 2 Results (Students)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mayer [15] and Pi et al [18] argued that the inclusion of an instructor's image would not have a strong impact on learning. On the other hand, Kokoc et al [10] found that picture-in-picture video lectures with the instructor's image yield improved performance. To minimize distraction, our environment continues not to show the instructor's image.…”
Section: User Study 2 Results (Students)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their studies made an important contribution to instructional design to define key design principles for video production in the context of video learning at scale. In the past few years, as video use has continued to provide a main method for instruction, there have been wide explorations (Giannakos, 2013) of video length (Guo et al, 2014;Luo et al, 2018), speaking speeds of lecturers (Lemay & Doleck, 2020), segmentation of video lectures (Kay, 2012), variations in instructor audio streams (Kim et al, 2014), and video lecture types, such as voiceover presentations, lecture captures, picture-in-picture style, and Khan style (Chen & Wu, 2015;Hansch et al, 2015;Ilioudi et al, 2013;Kokoç et al, 2020;Sadik, 2016). Other studies have compared hand-drawn versus narration-over-PowerPoint (Chen & Thomas, 2020) or looked at screencast video lectures Swarts, 2012).…”
Section: Using Learning Analytics To Understand Video-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eye tracking technology could be used to uncover the cognitive processes involved in different designs of narrated slideshow. Eye tracking technology is a useful tool for measuring cognitive processes in research (Alemdag & Cagiltay, 2018 ; Liao et al, 2020 ; Lin et al, 2015 ) by enabling researchers to detect the allocation of attention (e.g., Hsu et al, 2019 ; Kokoc et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%