1982
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sympathetic nerve stimulation on intra‐oral mechanoreceptor activity in the cat

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Micro-electrode recordings were made from intra-oral mechanoreceptor neurones in the trigeminal ganglion and mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth nerve in the cat.2. The effect of cervical sympathetic trunk stimulation on the discharge of the mechanoreceptors to a controlled force was observed.3. Almost half of the mechanoreceptor neurones studied were modulated by sympathetic stimulation. Sympathetic stimulation both decreased the impulse frequency to a controlled force application and raised the thre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous reports have indicated that catecholamines can modulate the activity of several somatic and visceral afferent inputs, and effects of opposite sign have been reported for different receptors (references in Akoev, 1981, and. In particular, various receptors in the teeth and periodontal structures are modulated by sympathetic stimulation (Matthews, 1976;Cash & Linden, 1982;Passatore & Filippi, 1983;Aars, Brodin & Bj0rnland, 1988) and the existence of sympathetic fibres innervating the temporomandibular joint has been recently reported (Widenfalk & Wiberg, 1990). It has also been reported (Shyu, Olausson, Huang, Widerstr6m & Andersson, 1989) that sensory information carried by certain populations of C fibres is reduced by activation of the sympathetic system, due to an action exerted on impulse transmission in the peripheral nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous reports have indicated that catecholamines can modulate the activity of several somatic and visceral afferent inputs, and effects of opposite sign have been reported for different receptors (references in Akoev, 1981, and. In particular, various receptors in the teeth and periodontal structures are modulated by sympathetic stimulation (Matthews, 1976;Cash & Linden, 1982;Passatore & Filippi, 1983;Aars, Brodin & Bj0rnland, 1988) and the existence of sympathetic fibres innervating the temporomandibular joint has been recently reported (Widenfalk & Wiberg, 1990). It has also been reported (Shyu, Olausson, Huang, Widerstr6m & Andersson, 1989) that sensory information carried by certain populations of C fibres is reduced by activation of the sympathetic system, due to an action exerted on impulse transmission in the peripheral nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also good evidence that periodofital mechanoreceptors are involved in reflex jaw opening and closing in man and animals (Matthews, 1975). Activity of receptors that respond to forces applied to the teeth and their supporting structures has been reported by many workers in a variety of species: man (Johansson & Olsson, 1976); cat (Pfaffmann, 1939a, b;Yamada, Sakada, Murata & Ueyama, 1961;Suzuki, 1963;Kawamura, Nishiyama, Funakoshi & Majima, 1965;Kizior, Cuozzo & Bowman, 1968;Sakada & Kamio, 1970, 1971Hilton, 1972;Sakada & Onodera, 1974;Hannam & Farnsworth, 1977; Linden, 1978;Cash & Linden, 1982); rabbit (Ness, 1954) and dog (Wagers & Smith, 1960;Matthews, 1965;Hannam, 1968aHannam, , b, 1969a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible source of reflex influences on upper airway resistance would be the presence of vagal afferents coursing in the sympathetic trunk [28]. Also, cervical sympathetic trunk stimulation is known to inhibit intraoral mechanoreceptor activity in cats [34]. Therefore, one cannot entirely exclude the possibility that sympathetic stimulation alters the activity of upper airway receptors or vagal afferents which might reflexly affect upper airway muscle activity and therefore resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%