“…Tables S3 and S4 present a full summary of the risk of bias for the included studies. Of the 13 observational studies, seven (54%) were of high quality [ 35 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 43 , 51 , 58 ] and the rest were of moderate quality; 46% of the observational studies did not mention adjustment for confounders [ 27 , 28 , 36 , 41 , 47 , 50 ]. The details of the 31 RCTs were as follows: (1) selection bias: 12 out of 31 studies reported the method of random sequence generation, [ 6 , 23 , 26 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 44 – 46 , 49 , 52 , 55 ] while the others did not.…”