2004
DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[1161:eotobp]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Tagging on Behavior, Provisioning, and Reproduction in the Common Murre (Uria Aalge), a Diving Seabird

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, loggers up to 27g had no discernible impacts on foraging, breeding site attendance or food delivery to chicks of either species (e.g. Monaghan et al, 1994;Benvenuti et al, 2001;Tremblay et al, 2003), although some adverse effects have been detected using other devices (Hamel et al, 2004;Paredes et al, 2005). In this study, time spent at the colony during daylight hours did not differ between individuals with loggers and unequipped controls either for guillemots (11.1±2.7h and 10.7±3.9h, respectively; GLM with year as a fixed effect and bird identity as a random effect; F 1,40 0.1, P0.8) or for razorbills (10.0±3.7h and 10.7±2.5h, respectively; F 1,16 0.4, P0.6).…”
Section: Bird-borne Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In previous studies, loggers up to 27g had no discernible impacts on foraging, breeding site attendance or food delivery to chicks of either species (e.g. Monaghan et al, 1994;Benvenuti et al, 2001;Tremblay et al, 2003), although some adverse effects have been detected using other devices (Hamel et al, 2004;Paredes et al, 2005). In this study, time spent at the colony during daylight hours did not differ between individuals with loggers and unequipped controls either for guillemots (11.1±2.7h and 10.7±3.9h, respectively; GLM with year as a fixed effect and bird identity as a random effect; F 1,40 0.1, P0.8) or for razorbills (10.0±3.7h and 10.7±2.5h, respectively; F 1,16 0.4, P0.6).…”
Section: Bird-borne Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Because resighting effort was very thorough at all five puffin breeding colonies in the Gulf of Maine (the three study islands as well as the nearby puffin colonies at Machias Seal Island, New Brunswick, and Petit Manan National Wildlife Refuge, Maine), we believe that we resighted most of the returning puffins. We use the return rate of banded birds as a metric that approximates survival, an approach that is common in avian studies (Hamel et al 2004;Oro et al 2011). To allow for maturation at sea by some individuals, we did not include chicks weighed and To determine if there was a difference in postfledging survival in relation to the chick condition, we used a T-test comparing the weight/wing cord ratio of 612 chicks that were later resighted at any breeding colony in the Gulf of Maine and 276 chicks that were not resighted.…”
Section: Chick Condition and Return Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…time-depth recorders, radio transmitters, satellite transmitters) has increased considerably over recent years (e.g. Tremblay et al 2003;Hamel et al 2004;Iguan et al 2005;Philips et al 2003; Anker-Nilssen and Aarvak 2009). However, some studies indicate a potentially detrimental effect of devices on the birds' behaviour, possibly biasing the data collected (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%