2019
DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Targeted Versus Adjustable Protein Fortification of Breast Milk on Early Growth in Very Low‐Birth‐Weight Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: Background Breast milk is preferred for the feeding of very low‐birth‐weight (VLBW) infants, but it does not meet nutrition requirements unless it is fortified. Adequate protein intake to maintain the growth of preterm infants cannot be provided by standard fortification methods because of variation in the protein content of human milk. Individualization is necessary to achieve target protein intakes. The goal of this study was to compare the effects of 2 different methods of individualized protein fortificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…groups or RCT design [12,25,26,29]. Three RCTs only adjusted protein, however, one of these studies found tremendous improvement of growth in the TFO compared to SF group (25.5 vs 12.0 g/kg/ d) [7,23,30]. The three remaining studies reported no difference or a reduced weight gain in the intervention group [24,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…groups or RCT design [12,25,26,29]. Three RCTs only adjusted protein, however, one of these studies found tremendous improvement of growth in the TFO compared to SF group (25.5 vs 12.0 g/kg/ d) [7,23,30]. The three remaining studies reported no difference or a reduced weight gain in the intervention group [24,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing gestational age–specific fortifiers requires a complete understanding of their nutrition needs and composition of enteral intake. Human‐milk analyzers have been suggested as a means to address the nutrient disparity in human‐milk samples to promote better weight gain through targeted fortification 50‐52 . Human‐milk analyzers are expensive and may not be feasible outside of the research setting in which daily or weekly analysis of breast milk would be cumbersome and time consuming.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted protein fortification in human milk feedings has been examined in previous studies, but to our knowledge, none to date have described the use of baseline protein enrichment to improve early delivery with the initiation of enteral feedings and prior to multicomponent fortification [ 10 , 12 , 14 , 16 , 18 ]. Although multicomponent fortification is necessary to meet recommended nutrient intake, there is no consensus on the optimal timing of fortification in VLBW infants, which is often delayed due to the theoretical risk for NEC and feeding intolerance, despite lack of evidence of an association between early fortification and NEC [ 22 , 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One recent randomized controlled trial showed improved postnatal growth with targeted intake to meet recommendations from the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN), including 4.5 g/kg/day protein [ 8 , 9 ]. Other smaller studies that targeted protein concentrations only or macronutrient concentrations that did not meet ESPGHAN intake or protein:energy ratio recommendations found more mixed results [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Although targeted fortification may be feasible, barriers to widespread use exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%