Effects of TASC Learning Model (Thinking Actively In A Social Context) on Ability Problem-solving in Natural Resource Management Materials

Mutaqy, Rosikh Musabikha; Nasution, Nasution; Purnomo, Nugroho Hari

doi:10.26740/ijss.v2n1.p11-20

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous researches have discussed a lot about learning models, like the research conducted by Mutaqy et al (2019). The results of their research show that TASC learning model has an effect on students' problem-solving skills in the natural resource material.…”

Section: Figure 1 Chart Of Tasc Model Stagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Thinking Actively in a Social Context and Creative Problem-Solving Learning Models on Divergent-Thinking Skills Viewed from Adversity Quotient

Fauziah¹,

Mahfud²,

Murwaningsih³

et al. 2020

EUROPEAN J ED RES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to find out: (1) the more effective learning model on students' divergent-thinking skills; (2) the better adversity quotient on students' divergent-thinking skills; (3) the better adversity quotient to improve students' divergent-thinking skills in each learning model; and (4) the better learning model to improve students' divergent-thinking skills in each adversity quotient. This research uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental type. The fifth-grade students were selected as the research subjects. This research was carried out at the public elementary schools in Laweyan District, Surakarta, Indonesia. Test and questionnaire techniques were used to collect data. The data analysis was performed with the analysis prerequisite, hypothesis, and multiple-comparison tests. The results showed that the learning model and adversity quotient have an influence on divergentthinking skills; for each adversity quotient, the thinking actively in a social context learning model is better than the creative problem solving and direct instruction learning model; the creative problem solving learning model is better than the direct instruction learning model; and adversity quotient of the climbers is better than that of the campers and the adversity quotient of the campers is better than that of the quitters in each learning model.

show abstract

Section: Figure 1 Chart Of Tasc Model Stagesmentioning

confidence: 99%