“…The studies in our review were subject to certain limitations. This included insufficient results to draw any conclusions [ 12 ], challenges in generalizing the findings [ 13 , 15 , 27 , 35 , 48 , 50 , 51 ], language difficulties among patients [ 13 ], a lack of detail on the effect of the intervention elements [ 13 ], the possibility of contamination of information between patient groups [ 14 , 19 , 34 , 44 ], uncontrolled variables [ 14 , 21 , 22 , 26 , 29 , 31 , 37 ], short duration of studies, interventions, or follow-up [ 15 , 19 , 27 , 30 , 35 , 41 , 51 ], the patients already being familiar with educational content [ 17 ], small sample size [ 29 , 30 , 37 , 41 , 46 , 49 , 52 ], self-selection bias [ 52 ], not all information being analyzed [ 20 , 48 ], subjective results linked to patient declarations [ 23 ], inaccurate assessment tools [ 42 ], possible Hawthorne effect [ 30 ], interventions conducted in a single center [ 30 , 41 ], and the possibility of social desirability effect bias [ 39 ,…”