2019
DOI: 10.1080/10573569.2019.1655690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Technology-Supported Language Experience Approach for English Learners With Exceptional Needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jacob et al. (2016) restricted their sample to students in Grades 2–5 who were half a year to 2.5 years behind grade level, as measured by the Sight Word Efficiency subtest of the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE; Torgesen et al., 1999) and the AimsWeb (Shinn et al., 2004) oral reading fluency task. In one SCED study (McCarty, 2012), all EL participants had a diagnosis of LD, with documented difficulties with decoding and/or reading fluency.…”
Section: Word‐level Reading Difficulties (Wlrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jacob et al. (2016) restricted their sample to students in Grades 2–5 who were half a year to 2.5 years behind grade level, as measured by the Sight Word Efficiency subtest of the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE; Torgesen et al., 1999) and the AimsWeb (Shinn et al., 2004) oral reading fluency task. In one SCED study (McCarty, 2012), all EL participants had a diagnosis of LD, with documented difficulties with decoding and/or reading fluency.…”
Section: Word‐level Reading Difficulties (Wlrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we fit random intercepts (levels) during the baseline phase and random intercepts and linear slopes (liner time trends) during the treatment phase. The only exception was Jozwik and Mustian (2020), where linear slope was modeled as fixed effects because of a nonconvergence issue. Finally, we constrained the number of baseline sessions to five and the follow-up time-points to 18 across the studies, because this was the common time parameter across studies.…”
Section: Effect-size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedback given by the system includes word spelling check, grammar check, and pronunciation check. In addition to the legacy word check, two scholars conducted a survey of learners who used this system, and 79% of the students were satisfied with the effect of the system [14]. The scholars from Ho Chi Minh City University of Science and Technology in Vietnam jointly used the E-Learning system to conduct related research on the writing evaluation of English learners in junior high schools [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there were many researchers particularly in language area within digital surrounding such as (Bajrami & Ismaili, 2016;Beschorner et al, 2018;Cuaca Dharma et al, 2017;Jozwik & Mustian, 2019;Sirivedin et al, 2018;Tridinanti, 2017), yet, in the fact that the research of DE in language learning field is still rarely done or found by researchers, probably it basically comes from anthropology or sociology that poses culture value in the research analysis. Therefore, the discussion above limits only in the number of 10 articles that were chosen particularly in language learning studies.…”
Section: Autoethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the activities of language learning and teaching process may be held whether inside or outside the classroom. The several researches that investigated some technology aids in language learning for instance applied on practicing technology tools such as video materials (Bajrami & Ismaili, 2016), technology integration planning cycle (Beschorner et al, 2018), platform of Skype and Zoom (Cuaca Dharma et al, 2017), technology-supported LEA (Jozwik & Mustian, 2019), digital storytelling (Tridinanti, 2017), and social networking of Facebook (Sirivedin et al, 2018). There are also on technology concern in development researches particularly on designing Information, Communication and Technology such as designing ICT competences-integrated language awareness (English phonetics and phonology, English morphology and syntax, and English socio-pragmatic) (Tampubolon & Darmahusni, 2019), designing ICT competencesintegrated writing syllabuses (Syifa & Darmahusni, 2019), designing ICT competence-integrated syllabuses of reading course (Bandan & Dewanti, 2019), and designing ICT competences-integrated syllabuses of Grammar courses (Purnawati & Iskandar, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%