1960
DOI: 10.1104/pp.35.5.575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Temperature and Humidity on Foliar Absorption and Translocation of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid and Benzoic Acid

Abstract: Little is known concerning the effect of humidity on the absorption of foliarly applied materials or their subsequent translocation. It is generally believed that the higher the humidity at any one temperature, the larger the amount of a foliarly applied material that penetrates the leaf per unit time. Most of the evidence for such an effect has been obtained indirectly. Koontz and Biddulph (16) found that the amount of phosphorus translocated from a given compound seemed to be related to the drying time of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
1
4

Year Published

1961
1961
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
40
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Uptake doubled under highhumidity conditions in poplar, and when spray droplets were rewetted after drying under lowhumidity conditions, 2,4-D uptake increased (Sharma and Vandenborn 1970). Uptake was greater at humidity levels ranging from 70 to 74% compared with 34 to 48% and a difference was not measured between the drying times of herbicide spray droplets under the two humidity levels (Pallas 1960). Uptake of 2,4-D was greater when the humidity level was 100% as compared with 40%, and the rate of translocation to the meristematic region and rhizomes was much faster at 100% relative humidity in wolftail (Carex cherokeensis Schwein) (Burns et al 1969).…”
Section: Uptake and Translocationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Uptake doubled under highhumidity conditions in poplar, and when spray droplets were rewetted after drying under lowhumidity conditions, 2,4-D uptake increased (Sharma and Vandenborn 1970). Uptake was greater at humidity levels ranging from 70 to 74% compared with 34 to 48% and a difference was not measured between the drying times of herbicide spray droplets under the two humidity levels (Pallas 1960). Uptake of 2,4-D was greater when the humidity level was 100% as compared with 40%, and the rate of translocation to the meristematic region and rhizomes was much faster at 100% relative humidity in wolftail (Carex cherokeensis Schwein) (Burns et al 1969).…”
Section: Uptake and Translocationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Went and Carter (14) found that uptake of sucrose by tomato leaves was indepen-lent of humidity levels. Other workers reported that high humidity increased the absorption of foliarapplied urea, 2,4-D, and maleic hydrazide (Volk & McAuliff, 13; Zukel et al, 16;Pallas,10). It has been reported also that plants might absorb water fronm humid air through the leaves by a reversal of the normal transpiration stream, a process termed "negative transpiration" (Stone et al,12; Breazeale et al, 2,3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work (Butts and Fang 1956;Weintraub, Reinhart, and Scherff 1956;Ashton 1962;Morgan and Hall 1962;Slife et al 1962) has shown that differential absorption is not always correlated" with resistance or susceptibility. That the degree of absorption from the leaf surface cannot be taken as a basis for interpreting inherent resistance or susceptibility is strengthened by the evidence that absorption is influenced by external conditions like temperature and humidity (Barrier and Loomis 1957;Pallas 1960) and the pH of the solution (Crafts 1956), and that widely variable absorptions can be obtained for a given species under identical conditions (Holley, Boyle, and Hand 1950). Nevertheless, the amount taken up reflects at least part of the fate of the applied substance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%