Purpose
To compare the tensile properties of a 3-0, 4-strand flexor tendon repair to a 4-0, 4 strand repair and a 4-0, 8-strand repair.
Methods
Following evaluation of the intrinsic material properties of the 2 core suture calibers most commonly used in tendon repair (3-0 and 4-0), we tested the mechanical properties of 40 cadaver flexor digitorum profundus tendons after zone II repair with one of 3 techniques: a 3-0, 4-strand core repair, a 4-0, 8-strand repair, or a 4-0, 4-strand repair. We compared results across suture caliber for the 2 sutures and across tendon repair methods.
Results
Maximum load to failure of 3-0 polyfilament caprolactam suture was 49% greater than that of 4-0 polyfilament caprolactam suture. The cross sectional area of 3-0 Supramid was 42% greater than that of 4-0 Supramid. The 4-0, 8 strand, repair produced greater maximum load to failure when compared to the 2 4-strand techniques. Load at 2 mm gap, stiffness, and work to yield were significantly greater in the 4-0, 8-strand repair when compared to the 3-0, 4-strand repair.
Discussion
In an ex vivo model, an 8-strand repair using 4-0 suture was 43% stronger than a 4-strand repair using 3-0 suture, despite the finding that 3-0 polyfilament caprolactam was 49% stronger than was 4-0 polyfilament caprolactam. These results suggest that, although larger caliber suture has superior tensile properties, the number of core suture strands across a repair site has an important effect on time zero, ex vivo flexor tendon repair strength.
Clinical Relevance
Surgeons should consider using techniques that prioritize multi-strand core suture repair over an increase in suture caliber.