2016
DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the Affordable Care Act's Dependent Coverage Mandate on Private Health Insurance Coverage in Urban and Rural Areas

Abstract: Although young adults in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas experienced increased access to private health insurance following the ACA's dependent coverage mandate, it did not appear to directly impact rural-urban disparities in health insurance coverage. Despite residents in both areas gaining insurance coverage, over one-third of young adults still lacked access to full-year health insurance coverage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I next explore whether the effects of the provision on fertility vary by metropolitan status since rural families have historically faced higher rates of uninsurance rates than urban families (Ziller et al 2008), estimating the analysis separately for individuals living in a metropolitan statistical area (urban) and those living outside a metropolitan statistical area (rural), with results presented subsequently in Table 4. Results of these analyses show significant decreases in fertility rates across metropolitan status, which are consistent with the findings of Look et al (2016) that did not find differential effects of the young adult provision on health insurance coverage by metropolitan status.…”
Section: Fertilitysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…I next explore whether the effects of the provision on fertility vary by metropolitan status since rural families have historically faced higher rates of uninsurance rates than urban families (Ziller et al 2008), estimating the analysis separately for individuals living in a metropolitan statistical area (urban) and those living outside a metropolitan statistical area (rural), with results presented subsequently in Table 4. Results of these analyses show significant decreases in fertility rates across metropolitan status, which are consistent with the findings of Look et al (2016) that did not find differential effects of the young adult provision on health insurance coverage by metropolitan status.…”
Section: Fertilitysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…One of their key findings was increased utilization of preventive care, which may indicate the expansion improved unmet demand for care among the newly eligible beneficiaries from rural settings. In another study focusing on the dependent coverage mandate, Look et al examined 2006‐2009 (premandate) and 2011 (postmandate) data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to examine changes in coverage patterns among rural and urban young adults. Coverage uptake was similar across both urban and rural settings through the first year of the mandate, and much of the prevailing gap in coverage between urban and rural young adults was largely erased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research indicates that access to and the use of health services are associated with the patients' likelihood for readmission; therefore, these factors will help explain some of the HRR-level variations in hospital readmission rates [16]. Additionally, we examined the impact of the Accountable Care Act of 2010 (ACA)measured through the total performance score on hospitals 30-day readmission [5,31]. We defined the health system by the structure of health-care facilities, such as size, location, teaching status, and ownership.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%