2012
DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the Binding Communication Paradigm on Attitudes

Abstract: The binding communication approach is situated at the intersection of research on persuasive communication and commitment. Binding communication refers to the combination of a preparatory act involving commitment and a persuasive message. Two studies showed that differences in attitudes toward recycling (Study 1) or swimming (Study 2) are more likely to occur following a persuasive message combined with a preparatory act involving commitment (i.e., binding communication) as compared to either technique alone. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, the binding communication (e.g., Joule, Girandola, & Bernard, 2007) consists in bringing participants to perform a committing preparatory act before exposing them to a persuasive message. This type of procedure favors the message processing (Michelik, Girandola, Joule, Zbinden, & Souchet, 2012) and makes the individual more sensitive and receptive to its content (see Hovland, Campbell, & Brock, 1957). Furthermore, it allows more important attitude changes compared to a commitment condition (Michelik et al, 2012), favors behavioral intention and action (see Zbinden, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thirdly, the binding communication (e.g., Joule, Girandola, & Bernard, 2007) consists in bringing participants to perform a committing preparatory act before exposing them to a persuasive message. This type of procedure favors the message processing (Michelik, Girandola, Joule, Zbinden, & Souchet, 2012) and makes the individual more sensitive and receptive to its content (see Hovland, Campbell, & Brock, 1957). Furthermore, it allows more important attitude changes compared to a commitment condition (Michelik et al, 2012), favors behavioral intention and action (see Zbinden, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of procedure favors the message processing (Michelik, Girandola, Joule, Zbinden, & Souchet, 2012) and makes the individual more sensitive and receptive to its content (see Hovland, Campbell, & Brock, 1957). Furthermore, it allows more important attitude changes compared to a commitment condition (Michelik et al, 2012), favors behavioral intention and action (see Zbinden, 2011). Let us specify that, to obtain these effects, the act and the message have to be consistent (i.e., concerning the same theme, going in the same direction; see Michelik et al, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…", to which we could add another important one: "Which preparatory actions must I obtain from those I want to rally?". A binding communication approach is distinguished from a more "traditional" one by taking into account this last question, and by conferring the status of "actor" on the target rather than that of a mere passive receiver (Girandola andJoule 2012, 2013;Joule et al 2007;Michelik et al 2012;Demarque et al 2013a).…”
Section: Toward a Binding Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding attitude change, binding communication has proved more efficient than persuasion strategies with regard to recycling attitudes (Michelik, Girandola, Joule, Zbinden, & Souchet, 2012; Zbinden et al, 2011) and pro-environmental attitudes (Demarque, Apostolidis, & Joule, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%