2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4381297
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the Concept of Fast-Track Surgery Combined with Empathic Nursing on Perioperative Complication Prevention and Postoperative Recovery of Gynecological Malignant Tumor Patients

Abstract: Objective. This study is aimed at exploring the effects of the concept of fast-track surgery (FTS) combined with empathic nursing on perioperative complication prevention and postoperative recovery of gynecological malignant tumor patients. Methods. A total of 180 patients with gynecological malignant tumor treated by surgery in our hospital from September 2018 to October 2021 were randomly divided into three groups: group A, group B, and group C, with 60 patients in each group. Group C was given conventional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer are the three most prevalent gynecological malignancies, accounting for approximately 18% of all tumors worldwide[ 1 ]. The incidence rate has been rising recently, significantly negatively affecting women’s physical and emotional health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer are the three most prevalent gynecological malignancies, accounting for approximately 18% of all tumors worldwide[ 1 ]. The incidence rate has been rising recently, significantly negatively affecting women’s physical and emotional health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%