Effects of the COVID‐19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens’ Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two‐Wave Panel Study

Abstract

Preventive measures such as the national lockdown in Italy have been effective in slowing the spread of COVID‐19. However, they also had psychological and economic impacts on people’s lives, which should not be neglected as they may reduce citizens’ trust and compliance with future health mandates. Engaging citizens in their own health management and in the collaboration with health care professionals and authorities via the adoption of a collaborative approach to health policy development is fundamental to fostering such measures’ effectiveness. Psychosocial analysis of citizens’ concerns and emotional reactions to preventive policies is important in order to plan personalized health communication campaigns. Context Because of the COVID‐19 pandemic, between February 23 and March 8, 2020, some areas of Italy were declared “red zones,” with citizens asked to stay home and avoid unnecessary interpersonal contacts. Such measures were then extended, between March 10 and May 4, 2020, to the whole country. However, compliance with such behaviors had an important impact on citizens’ personal, psychological, and economic well‐being. This could result in reduced trust in authorities and lowered compliance. Keeping citizens engaged in their own health and in preventive behaviors is thus a key strategy for the success of such measures. This paper presents the results from a study conducted in Italy to monitor levels of people’s health engagement, sentiment, trust in authorities, and perception of risk at two different time points. Methods Two independent samples (n = 968 and n = 1,004), weighted to be representative of the adult Italian population, were recruited in two waves corresponding to crucial moments of the Italian COVID‐19 epidemic: between February 28 and March 4 (beginning of “phase 1,” after the first regional lockdowns), and between May 12 and May 18 (beginning of “phase 2,” after the national lockdown was partially dismissed). Respondents were asked to complete an online survey with a series of both validated measures and ad hoc items. A series of t‐tests, general linear models, and contingency tables were carried out to assess if and how our measures changed over time in different social groups. Findings Although sense of self and social responsibility increased between the two waves, and trust toward authorities remained substantially the same, trust in science, consumer sentiment, and health engagement decreased. Our results showed that while both the level of general concern for the emergency and the perceived risk of infection increased between the two waves, in the second wave our participants reported being more concerned for the economic consequences of the pandemic than the health risk. Conclusions The potentially disruptive psychological impact of lockdown may hamper citizens’ compliance with, and hence the effectiveness of, behavioral preventive measures. This suggests that preventive measures should be accompanied by collaborative educational plans aimed at promoting people’s health engagement b...

Different roles of interpersonal trust and institutional trust in COVID-19 pandemic control

“…Some research has found that trust held stable during the pandemic. For example, Graffigna et al (2021) conducted questionnaire measurements between March 10 and May 4, 2020, in Italy, and their results showed that people's trust toward authorities remained substantially unchanged. In contrast, there is also evidence showing that trust has consistently changed ( Algan et al, 2021 ; Esaiasson et al, 2021 ; Li et al, 2021 ).…”

Measuring citizens’ engagement during emergencies: Psychometric validation of the Public Health Engagement Scale for Emergency Settings (PHEs-E)

“…This study is part of a broader project (“Italian Citizens’ Food Habits Monitoring from a Consumer Psychology Perspective) aimed at monitoring Italian citizens’ habits. Previous publications from this study [ 39 , 40 ] included an early developed scale for the measurement of public health engagement ( Public Health Engagement Scale for Emergency Settings (PHEs-E)) and its first validation.…”

Psychological reaction to Covid-19 of Italian patients with IBD

“…"Covid-19 testing questions: For the presence of Covid-19 infection, four questions measured on dichotomous scales were used to explore whether the subjects themselves had undergone the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Covid-19 (yes/no) and what was the result (positive/negative), for themselves and their family. These items were also previously used in other researches [22,23].…”