2023
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067882
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of clinically extremely vulnerable children and children living with clinically extremely vulnerable people in Wales: a data linkage study

Abstract: ObjectivesTo determine whether clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) children or children living with a CEV person in Wales were at greater risk of presenting with anxiety or depression in primary or secondary care during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with children in the general population and to compare patterns of anxiety and depression during the pandemic (23 March 2020–31 January 2021, referred to as 2020/2021) and before the pandemic (23 March 2019–31 January 2020, referred to as 2019/2020), between CEV… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 49 , 51 Poor health and chronic health conditions are known risk factors of experiencing loneliness and poor mental health, potentially amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic for subgroups who had to shield because of their health condition. 49 , 52 , 53 Nevertheless, the longitudinal data allowed assessment of temporality by using measures of exposures (loneliness) preceding the outcome (Long COVID) and controlling for baseline loneliness, physical and mental health measures in a subsample with limited recall bias. Second, the sample representativeness and generalization of results was limited by self-selection response bias and drop-out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 49 , 51 Poor health and chronic health conditions are known risk factors of experiencing loneliness and poor mental health, potentially amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic for subgroups who had to shield because of their health condition. 49 , 52 , 53 Nevertheless, the longitudinal data allowed assessment of temporality by using measures of exposures (loneliness) preceding the outcome (Long COVID) and controlling for baseline loneliness, physical and mental health measures in a subsample with limited recall bias. Second, the sample representativeness and generalization of results was limited by self-selection response bias and drop-out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%