Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Précis: Based on a large administrative database of German claims data, our study provides current estimates of the prevalence and incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in Germany and describes selected outcomes for prevalent POAG patients. Purpose: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of POAG in Germany, to describe the patient population in terms of comorbidity burden, routine care, and overall healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs, and to describe treatment patterns over time in patients undergoing relevant laser procedures. Materials and Methods: Based on anonymized German claims data, we carried out a retrospective, non-interventional study covering calendar years 2016 to 2021. Results: For the adult German population (≥18 y), we estimated a POAG one-year prevalence of 1.70% and a one-year incidence of 0.17% in 2018; both increased with age, peaking in 80-89 year-olds. Prevalence and incidence were lower in 2020 (1.65% and 0.16%, respectively), the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Most patients solely received topical treatment. Most surgically-treated patients underwent laser trabeculoplasty, followed by laser iridotomy, trabeculectomy, and filtration operations with implant. In patients undergoing laser trabeculoplasty, the treatment regimen was nearly unchanged in the second year after, compared to two years before the procedure. Multimorbidity was commonly observed; 75.5% of patients had arterial hypertension and 50.0% had disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidemias, compared to 60.1% and 39.2%, respectively, in an age- and sex-matched control sample. Conclusions: Our study provides insights into epidemiology and routine care of POAG in Germany and HCRU in prevalent patients. There was little change in treatment regimens in patients who underwent laser trabeculoplasty, two years after the procedure. Most patients were multimorbid highlighting the need for comprehensive care.
Précis: Based on a large administrative database of German claims data, our study provides current estimates of the prevalence and incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in Germany and describes selected outcomes for prevalent POAG patients. Purpose: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of POAG in Germany, to describe the patient population in terms of comorbidity burden, routine care, and overall healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs, and to describe treatment patterns over time in patients undergoing relevant laser procedures. Materials and Methods: Based on anonymized German claims data, we carried out a retrospective, non-interventional study covering calendar years 2016 to 2021. Results: For the adult German population (≥18 y), we estimated a POAG one-year prevalence of 1.70% and a one-year incidence of 0.17% in 2018; both increased with age, peaking in 80-89 year-olds. Prevalence and incidence were lower in 2020 (1.65% and 0.16%, respectively), the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Most patients solely received topical treatment. Most surgically-treated patients underwent laser trabeculoplasty, followed by laser iridotomy, trabeculectomy, and filtration operations with implant. In patients undergoing laser trabeculoplasty, the treatment regimen was nearly unchanged in the second year after, compared to two years before the procedure. Multimorbidity was commonly observed; 75.5% of patients had arterial hypertension and 50.0% had disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidemias, compared to 60.1% and 39.2%, respectively, in an age- and sex-matched control sample. Conclusions: Our study provides insights into epidemiology and routine care of POAG in Germany and HCRU in prevalent patients. There was little change in treatment regimens in patients who underwent laser trabeculoplasty, two years after the procedure. Most patients were multimorbid highlighting the need for comprehensive care.
Background and aim The first SARS-CoV-2 pandemic wave in Germany involved a tradeoff between saving the lives of COVID-19 patients by providing sufficient intensive care unit (ICU) capacity and foregoing the health benefits of elective procedures. This study aims to quantify this tradeoff. Methods The analysis is conducted at both the individual and population levels. The analysis calculates quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to facilitate a comparison between the health gains from saving the lives of COVID-19 patients in the ICU and the health losses associated with postponing operative procedures. The QALYs gained from saving the lives of COVID-19 patients are calculated based on both the real-world ICU admissions and deaths averted from flattening the first wave. Scenario analysis was used to account for variation in input factors. Results At the individual level, the resource-adjusted QALY gain of saving one COVID-19 life is predicted to be 3 to 15 times larger than the QALY loss of deferring one operation (the average multiplier is 9). The real-world QALY gain at the population level is estimated to fall within the range of the QALY loss due to delayed procedures. The modeled QALY gain by flattening the first wave is 3 to 31 times larger than the QALY loss due to delayed procedures (the average multiplier is 17). Conclusion During the first wave of the pandemic, the resource-adjusted health gain from treating one COVID-19 patient in the ICU was found to be much larger than the health loss from deferring one operation. At the population level, flattening the first wave led to a much larger health gain than the health loss from delaying operative procedures.
Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted healthcare systems worldwide, including the delivery of ophthalmic emergency services. This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical presentation of emergencies and the accessibility of healthcare in ophthalmology. Methods: The study employed a single-center, consecutive case series design with historical controls to examine electronic health records over a 21-day period during the COVID-19 pandemic and a matched period from the preceding year. Records were analyzed for demographic variables, diagnosis, length of stay, travel distance, and referral status. The urgency of cases was evaluated by three independent graders using the BaSe SCOrE (BAsic SEverity Score for Common OculaR Emergencies). Results: A total of 1229 patients were included in the study, with 786 patients in the 2019 cohort and 443 patients in the 2020 cohort. During the pandemic period, there was a significant decrease in the number of patients and the duration of their visits (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively). There was an increase in walk-in patients (p = 0.03), who took significantly longer journeys to be treated as compared to referred patients (p < 0.01). At the same time, the severity of emergencies increased (p = 0.02). The 2019 logistic regression model found that age (p = 0.003), referral status (p < 0.001), distance (p = 0.009), and first presentation (p = 0.02) were significant predictors of the severity, while gender was not (p = 0.78). The 2020 model found that only age (p < 0.001) and referral status (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of severity. Conclusions: The observed decline in patient volume, increased severity of emergencies, and shifts in predictive variables within the logistic regression models are indicative of significant barriers to healthcare access. Therefore, enhancing health literacy and ensuring low-threshold access to emergency services are crucial, especially during crises.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.