“…One should note here that in the case of resonant configurations (i.e., when, in the absence of interactions, the energy of the localized impurity level coincides with the conduction or the valence band), the anticrossing model so far has only been applied to iso-electronic highly mismatched alloys, such as the dilute III-V and II-VI ternaries (Ga,As)N (Wu et al, 2002), ZnSe(O) (Mayer et al, 2012), CdTe(O) (Wełna et al, 2015), GaAs (Bi) (Alberi et al, 2007b), GaAs(Sb) (Alberi and Scarpulla, 2008), Ge(Sn) (Alberi and Scarpulla, 2008), as well as to some quaternary combinations, e.g., (Zn,Mn)(Te,O) (Yu et al, 2003) and (Zn,Cd)(Te,O) (Wełna et al, 2019). The (III,Mn)V FMS systems being discussed in this paper (where group-III ions are replaced by divalent Mn 2+ impurity) involve non-isoelectronic combinations of elements so that-in addition to new insights which studies of this configuration may provide in the area magnetic properties-they may also be valuable for a wider understanding of the physics of band anticrossing generally.…”