Effects of the Income Stabilization Tool on farm income level, variability and concentration in Italian agriculture

Abstract

This paper provides an ex ante assessment of the effects of the Income Stabilization Tool (IST), a new risk management tool proposed in the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union. We investigate the effects of IST on income variability and levels as well as on income inequality in the farming population. We take Italian agriculture as an example as the introduction of IST is currently under discussion there. A rich panel of 2777 farms was studied over a period of 7 years. We use stochastic simulation to derive different income inequality estimates and apply Gini decomposition approaches to assess the distributional implications of IST. We compare the current income situation with that resulting from a hypothetical implementation of IST under different policy scenarios, also accounting for reduced levels of CAP direct payments. We find that IST not only stabilizes farm income but also enhances its level and reduces income inequality in Italian agriculture. IST is more effective in reducing income inequality when farmers pay contributions to mutual funds that are proportional to their income compared to the case of flat rate contributions. Finally, results do not support the hypothesis that the impact of IST will differ if the level of direct payments were to be reduced. Thus, results seem robust enough to accommodate future policy conditions.

The Contribution of Agricultural Production on Selected Sustainable Development Goals in the Brics: A Panel Analysis

“…The results reveal that 1 percent increase in agriculture activities reduces income inequality by 0.7 percent. Similar result was obtained by Severini et al (2019), who used stochastic simulations to examine the relationship income inequality and agriculture in Italy. The authors found that farmers who used income stabilizers managed to reduce income inequality compared to those who did not use income stabilizers.…”

Twenty Years of Common Agricultural Policy in Europe: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…The year 2019 registered an increase of over 11%, demonstrating that this is a relevant topic for academics. This exponential growth is linked with the necessity to investigate the effects of PAC 2014-2020, and to determine the scientific soundness for the implementation of the new PAC 2021-2017 [26][27][28]. The analysis of the references cited is developed in two stages.…”

Insuring Weather Risks in European Agriculture

“…Even insurance schemes for revenues or even income levels exist (e.g. Severini et al ., 2019). Most common insurance schemes that cover weather‐related damages are indemnity insurances.…”

“…These can for example be insurance solutions at the level of revenues or incomes (e.g. Severini et al ., 2019) and insurance solutions that base payoffs on the occurrence of an adverse weather event instead of on damages (i.e. index insurances, Box 1) because insurance payoffs may not be linked to outcomes of specific farm activities.…”