Pipelines 2013 2013
DOI: 10.1061/9780784413012.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the Location of Broken Prestressing Wire Wraps in Structural Integrity of a Damaged PCCP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ere are four methods for modeling prestress in wires in FEA: the equivalent load method, initial strain method, equivalent cooling method, and wire-wrapping model [21]. In the equivalent load method used in most studies [18,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], it does not consider the stiffness of wires and as a result it is difficult to simulate the stress increment in steel wires under the external loads in pipes with broken wires. In the strain method proposed by Lin [31], applying an initial strain to steel wires was used to model the prestressing force; however, the loss of prestressing force cannot be considered in this method because the loss of prestressing force is represented by stress.…”
Section: Fea Model and Materials Constitutive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ere are four methods for modeling prestress in wires in FEA: the equivalent load method, initial strain method, equivalent cooling method, and wire-wrapping model [21]. In the equivalent load method used in most studies [18,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], it does not consider the stiffness of wires and as a result it is difficult to simulate the stress increment in steel wires under the external loads in pipes with broken wires. In the strain method proposed by Lin [31], applying an initial strain to steel wires was used to model the prestressing force; however, the loss of prestressing force cannot be considered in this method because the loss of prestressing force is represented by stress.…”
Section: Fea Model and Materials Constitutive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is not practical to fully model the actual condition of each damaged joint. To simplify the modeling details and reduce computational costs, in previous studies the joints were assumed to conservatively have no interaction or full interaction between the bell end and spigot end (Alavinasab et al, 2013;Alavinasab and Hajali, 2014;Hajali et al, 2015). In this paper, the interactions between the PCCPs were defined by normal behavior (hard contact) and tangential behavior (contact algorithm).…”
Section: Pccp Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of broken wires increases, the bearing capacity of the PCCP sharply decreases, and the risk of pipe burst increases. Moreover, the wire break damage of the bell-and-spigot joint can decrease the overall strength of the PCCP more than that in the barrel of the pipe (Alavinasab et al, 2013;Hajali et al, 2015Hajali et al, , 2016b. Few studies available in the literature have thoroughly investigated the possible coupling disaster of PCCP pipelines in service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ge et al determined the effect of the adhesion quality of the mortar coating on the overall performance of PCCPs by only conducting elastic analysis [17]. The pipe performance as the water pressure and number of broken wires increased was studied by Alavinasab et al [18,19]. Then, Hajali et al [20,21] compared the effects of broken wire wraps in the middle of a pipe with those at a joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%