2017
DOI: 10.1108/rpj-08-2015-0114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the unit cell topology on the compression properties of porous Co-Cr scaffolds fabricated via selective laser melting

Abstract: Purpose Selective laser melting (SLM) is an additive manufacturing process suitable for fabricating metal porous scaffolds. The unit cell topology is a significant factor that determines the mechanical property of porous scaffolds. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effects of unit cell topology on the compression properties of porous Cobalt–chromium (Co-Cr) scaffolds fabricated by SLM using finite element (FE) and experimental measurement methods. Design/methodology/approach The Co-Cr a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of laser‐sintered CoCr implants on bone growth was previously reported using nonporous structures, or in porous scaffolds using electron beam melting technology only . More recently, the effect of different unit cells topologies on the mechanical properties of SLM‐processed CoCr porous scaffolds has been reported . The topological design was found to be responsible for 10‐fold differences in mechanical properties, whereas the material type for up to twofold differences .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of laser‐sintered CoCr implants on bone growth was previously reported using nonporous structures, or in porous scaffolds using electron beam melting technology only . More recently, the effect of different unit cells topologies on the mechanical properties of SLM‐processed CoCr porous scaffolds has been reported . The topological design was found to be responsible for 10‐fold differences in mechanical properties, whereas the material type for up to twofold differences .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…28 More recently, the effect of different unit cells topologies on the mechanical properties of SLM-processed CoCr porous scaffolds has been reported. 29,30 The topological design was found to be responsible for 10-fold differences in mechanical properties, whereas the material type for up to twofold differences. 29 While initial biological response to osteoblast-like cells 30 and the antibacterial properties of silk fibroin coatings have also been reported by the same authors, 31 the current knowledge on the biological response and topographical effects of 3D-printed CoCr lattices on osseointegration 28 is still relatively poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6.1). Other supporting comments on the texture of lattice surfaces can be found elsewhere [11,36,37,41,57,58,68,71,73,[80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]].…”
Section: Surface Defectsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Hildebrand and Rüegsegger [99] highlight additional parameters useful for characterising lattice structures with XCT, for example the ratio of surface area to volume which could allow for a comparison of attached particles in multiple samples. Dimensional measurements have been performed using XCT [98,100], SEM [11,13,68,69,73,[85][86][87][101][102][103] and optical microscopy [25,36,63,75,76,[104][105][106]. It is also relatively common to use Vernier callipers for the measurement of outer dimensions (for example, lattice diameter, length, width) [74,103,104,107].…”
Section: Quality Inspection Of Lattice Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main concerns of the previous studies have been to investigate the effects of the topological characteristics of the porous structure on their fatigue response, and as a result the performance comparisons have been made between porous structures with different topological designs but made from the same bulk materials (e.g. steel [29,30], magnesium [31,32], titanium [33][34][35], Co-Cr [36,37]). Therefore, it is currently not clear what the effects of material type on the normalized S-N curve are.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%