2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the visual landscape factors of an ecological waterscape on acoustic comfort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific objectives of this research are: (1) Evaluate the impact of the noise generated by the hover of a small quadcopter on the reported loudness, annoyance and pleasantness of different urban soundscapes. (2) Assess the influence of the overall sound level, particular acoustics characteristics of the quadcopter (Cabell et al, 2016;Christian and Cabell, 2017;Torija et al, 2019b;Zawodny et al, 2016) and non-acoustic factors such as visual scene (Liu et al, 2014;Ren and Kang, 2015;Viollon et al, 2002) on the perception of soundscapes with a hovering UAV. (3) Discuss the effect of ambient road traffic noise in masking UAV noise as a potential action for mitigating the noise impact of UAV operations in urban environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific objectives of this research are: (1) Evaluate the impact of the noise generated by the hover of a small quadcopter on the reported loudness, annoyance and pleasantness of different urban soundscapes. (2) Assess the influence of the overall sound level, particular acoustics characteristics of the quadcopter (Cabell et al, 2016;Christian and Cabell, 2017;Torija et al, 2019b;Zawodny et al, 2016) and non-acoustic factors such as visual scene (Liu et al, 2014;Ren and Kang, 2015;Viollon et al, 2002) on the perception of soundscapes with a hovering UAV. (3) Discuss the effect of ambient road traffic noise in masking UAV noise as a potential action for mitigating the noise impact of UAV operations in urban environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, tourists aging from 18 to 37 years old, who exhibited normal hearing and regular or corrected-to-normal vision, were selected as the study subjects. A sample size of 20~25 has been widely used in subjective comfort assessments (Hermida Cadena et al, 2017;Ratcliffe et al, 2013;Ren & Kang, 2015). Consequently, a sample size of 23 was adopted in this study, with a male-to-female ratio of ~1:1 (male 11, female 12) to ensure that the sample sex ratio was balanced.…”
Section: Audio-visual Comfort Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, these two models could be important for simplifying the numbers of evaluation parameters of spatial awareness and give a quantified indicator between the sound space perception and landscapes during the soundscape planning process [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%